Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 27 January 2009 08:24

Congressman acts to ban silent camera phones

Written by Nedim Hadzic

Image

Unveils The Camera Phone Predator Alert Act

 

Representative Pete King (R), of New York, has introduced a bill that would ban camera phones from having a silent mode when taking a picture.

The Camera Phone Predator Alert Act (H.R. 414) would require every mobile phone to sound a tone when a photograph is taken, and the bill would prohibit silencing or disabling it. The reason behind the initiative is that: “Congress finds that children and adolescents have been exploited by photographs taken in dressing rooms and public places with the use of a camera phone.”

Although it serves a noble cause, we're a bit worried that people who for some reason desire a silent camera mode will find workarounds for the measure. After all, phones have been hacked and cracked for years now, and very few vendors have managed to put a stop to it.

Apart from our doubts on the technical side, we’re not sure how would a simple tone stop anyone from doing the above actions. It's hard to envision the camera sound would ever be loud enough to deter predators in crowded public places, such as malls or playgrounds. On the other hand, if handset makers were forced to use an excruciatingly loud warning sound, it could put off regular users from using such devices, too. Also, sexual predators could still use affordable point and shoot cameras, or ultra zoom cameras, which feature a silent mode.

Don't get us wrong, it's not a bad initiative, but we think it will run into a multitude of issues, which will most likely inhibit it from ever being truly effective.

More here.

 

Last modified on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 09:14
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments