Featured Articles

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

Intel's 5th Core processor family, codenamed Broadwell, will launch in three lines for the mobile segment. We are talking about upcoming…

More...
Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Google's Chromebook OS should be updating automatically every six weeks, but Intel doesn't come close with its hardware refresh schedule.

More...
New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

Rumours involving upcoming Nexus devices are nothing uncommon, but this year there is a fair bit of confusion, especially on the…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 17 January 2008 09:47

The nForce 200 interconnection is a joke

Written by test

Image

It's all in the bandwidth


Nvidia really is chopping and changing its chipsets these days, and the nForce 200 or n200 chip is an interesting little beast, as it is a PCIe 2.0 controller which adds 32 lanes of PCIe 2.0 bandwith, but only communicates with the chipset using 16 lanes of PCIe 1.0 bandwidth.

When you consider that PCIe 2.0 doubles the available bandwidth of PCIe 1.0 per lane, then you have to wonder how Nvidia has managed to pull this one off. From what we have found, their only explanation is that there's enough bandwith there for the n200 to communicate with the chipset, be it the 780i or 780a, without any bottle necks. The reason for this is partly because of the SLI bridge connections and partly because the chipset can handle any overspill SLI data that doesn't use the bridge connection.

One has to question the implementation, though, as the third slot on the 780i chipset is connected to the MCP and not the SPP, and relies on PCIe 1.0. This makes us wonder how much faster the 790i will be in 3-Way SLI, as it should have three native PCIe 2.0 slots. As with the 780a, you'll be limited to either two x16 slots or a single x16 and two x8 slots. In other words, this chipset isn't a top of the line product, according to Nvidia's past classification system which required full x16 bandwidth for this kind of product.

And for those intending to use a 780i or 780a motherboard for some other types of x16 devices than Nvidia graphics cards, it's very possible that there will be some bandwidth issues due to the chipset designs. Corner cutting is never the best way of doing things and it really looks as if the n200 helps Nvidia cut some corners when it comes to product development and R&D expense, but it doesn't give their potential customers what they've come to expect from the company.

Last modified on Friday, 18 January 2008 04:54
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments