Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 17 January 2008 09:47

The nForce 200 interconnection is a joke

Written by test

Image

It's all in the bandwidth


Nvidia really is chopping and changing its chipsets these days, and the nForce 200 or n200 chip is an interesting little beast, as it is a PCIe 2.0 controller which adds 32 lanes of PCIe 2.0 bandwith, but only communicates with the chipset using 16 lanes of PCIe 1.0 bandwidth.

When you consider that PCIe 2.0 doubles the available bandwidth of PCIe 1.0 per lane, then you have to wonder how Nvidia has managed to pull this one off. From what we have found, their only explanation is that there's enough bandwith there for the n200 to communicate with the chipset, be it the 780i or 780a, without any bottle necks. The reason for this is partly because of the SLI bridge connections and partly because the chipset can handle any overspill SLI data that doesn't use the bridge connection.

One has to question the implementation, though, as the third slot on the 780i chipset is connected to the MCP and not the SPP, and relies on PCIe 1.0. This makes us wonder how much faster the 790i will be in 3-Way SLI, as it should have three native PCIe 2.0 slots. As with the 780a, you'll be limited to either two x16 slots or a single x16 and two x8 slots. In other words, this chipset isn't a top of the line product, according to Nvidia's past classification system which required full x16 bandwidth for this kind of product.

And for those intending to use a 780i or 780a motherboard for some other types of x16 devices than Nvidia graphics cards, it's very possible that there will be some bandwidth issues due to the chipset designs. Corner cutting is never the best way of doing things and it really looks as if the n200 helps Nvidia cut some corners when it comes to product development and R&D expense, but it doesn't give their potential customers what they've come to expect from the company.

Last modified on Friday, 18 January 2008 04:54
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments