Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 10 October 2007 13:16

Quantum sues Riverbed Technologies

Written by David Stellmack

Image

More patent infringement claimed


 

In what seems to be an unending string of patent infringement lawsuits in the technology market space, U.S.-based Quantum Corporation has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Riverbed Technologies, Inc. 

Quantum, a global storage company specializing in backup, recovery and archive solutions that provides an integrated range of disk, tape and software solutions, brought the claim on the basis that Riverbed is selling products that employ a method of data de-duplication that is protected by a Quantum patent.  Riverbed Technologies, Inc., headquartered in San Francisco, California, is a leading provider of wide area data services (WDS).

Riverbed issued a statement that is has no knowledge or reason to believe that it is infringing any patents or interests of any third party.

Last modified on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 13:27

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments