Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 11 March 2008 10:31

Deneb 0MB L3 doesn?t have L3 cache disabled

Written by Fuad Abazovic

Image

Secret weapon


We learned that Deneb, the 45nm CPU from the Stars generation with zero L3 cache, is going to be a native part. This means that Deneb without L3 cache simply won’t have the L3 cache disabled, it will be produced without it.

AMD plans to produce two versions of the chip and Deneb 6MB L3 will have the cache on the chip while Deneb 0 MB L3 version won't have the L3 cache disabled; AMD will manufacture this chip without L3 cache.

We can tell that 6MB of L3 cache takes a lot of space and it is likely that Deneb 0MB L3 is going to be AMD’s secret weapon that might lead to company’s recovery. This can easily be the smallest or among the smallest quad-core chips on the market, and we believe it will be massively smaller than Intel's Nehalem part.

A smaller core usually means better thermals and cheaper production. Our sources also added that the performance effect on the desktop CPUs without L3 is very small, so there is no big performance penalty, at least in the real world, but some benchmarks will suffer from it.

Last modified on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 14:10
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments