Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 11 March 2008 10:31

Deneb 0MB L3 doesn?t have L3 cache disabled

Written by Fuad Abazovic

Image

Secret weapon


We learned that Deneb, the 45nm CPU from the Stars generation with zero L3 cache, is going to be a native part. This means that Deneb without L3 cache simply won’t have the L3 cache disabled, it will be produced without it.

AMD plans to produce two versions of the chip and Deneb 6MB L3 will have the cache on the chip while Deneb 0 MB L3 version won't have the L3 cache disabled; AMD will manufacture this chip without L3 cache.

We can tell that 6MB of L3 cache takes a lot of space and it is likely that Deneb 0MB L3 is going to be AMD’s secret weapon that might lead to company’s recovery. This can easily be the smallest or among the smallest quad-core chips on the market, and we believe it will be massively smaller than Intel's Nehalem part.

A smaller core usually means better thermals and cheaper production. Our sources also added that the performance effect on the desktop CPUs without L3 is very small, so there is no big performance penalty, at least in the real world, but some benchmarks will suffer from it.

Last modified on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 14:10
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments