Featured Articles

Analyst reveals Apple Watch spec

Analyst reveals Apple Watch spec

An analyst has examined the Apple Watch supply chain in an effort to ascertain the exact spec of Cupertino’s new gadget…

More...
Nvidia's first 20nm product is a mobile SoC

Nvidia's first 20nm product is a mobile SoC

For much of the year we were under the impression that the second generation Maxwell will end up as a 20nm…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia adjusts GTX 980 and GTX 970 pricing

Nvidia adjusts GTX 980 and GTX 970 pricing

It appears that Nvidia has been feeling the pulse of the market and took some note from comments regarding the original…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 18 October 2007 10:35

2.8GHz Phenom FX is FX 80

Written by Fuad Abazovic

Image

King of the hill


AMD's fastest Phenom FX should be branded as Phenom FX80, and all future FX8x names should be reserved for Barcelona / Budapest-based quad core parts.

The Phenom FX is the show piece that should be able to compete with Intel's Penryn 3.0GHz, but the way it looks currently, Intel's quad core stands a better chance due to its clocking and SSE4. 3.0GHz versus 3GHz would be more interesting competition, but this won't happen until Q1; and at the same time Intel plans to introduce QX9770 with 3.2GHz clocking and FSB 1600. This one will make AMD work hard for its money once again.

Both Intel and AMD know that this is now where the money is, in 2.4 or slower parts. This is the sweet spot, and they will probably start a new price war in this particular segment.

Even if Intel wins the high end competition it won’t be safe in the 2.4 vs. 2.4GHz fight, and this one might be a tough one.


Last modified on Friday, 19 October 2007 06:46
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments