Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 18 October 2007 10:35

2.8GHz Phenom FX is FX 80

Written by Fuad Abazovic

Image

King of the hill


AMD's fastest Phenom FX should be branded as Phenom FX80, and all future FX8x names should be reserved for Barcelona / Budapest-based quad core parts.

The Phenom FX is the show piece that should be able to compete with Intel's Penryn 3.0GHz, but the way it looks currently, Intel's quad core stands a better chance due to its clocking and SSE4. 3.0GHz versus 3GHz would be more interesting competition, but this won't happen until Q1; and at the same time Intel plans to introduce QX9770 with 3.2GHz clocking and FSB 1600. This one will make AMD work hard for its money once again.

Both Intel and AMD know that this is now where the money is, in 2.4 or slower parts. This is the sweet spot, and they will probably start a new price war in this particular segment.

Even if Intel wins the high end competition it won’t be safe in the 2.4 vs. 2.4GHz fight, and this one might be a tough one.


Last modified on Friday, 19 October 2007 06:46
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments