Featured Articles

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

Intel's 5th Core processor family, codenamed Broadwell, will launch in three lines for the mobile segment. We are talking about upcoming…

More...
Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Google's Chromebook OS should be updating automatically every six weeks, but Intel doesn't come close with its hardware refresh schedule.

More...
New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

Rumours involving upcoming Nexus devices are nothing uncommon, but this year there is a fair bit of confusion, especially on the…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 17 September 2007 08:29

Leap Wireless Board rejects bid

Written by David Stellmack
Image

MetroPCS denied

The Board of Directors of Leap Wireless International has voted unanimously to reject the unsolicited bid from MetroPCS Communications to purchase Leap Wireless. Leap’s Board indicated that the bid was not sufficient to cover the future growth value of the company.

According to analysts the offer was valued at 8 ½ times Leap's estimated earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, which was less than the 9 times EBITDA from  other recent industry deals.

While Leap and MetroPCS are competitors, the bid to merge was viewed by some as necessary to remain competitive with other larger U.S. mobile service providers. 

A combination of the two wireless companies would have created a provider with a presence in nearly all 200 U.S. markets, but its cumulative 6.2 million subscribers would still be far fewer than that those of the top U.S. mobile players.

Read more here.

Last modified on Monday, 17 September 2007 09:09

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments