Featured Articles

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

Intel's 5th Core processor family, codenamed Broadwell, will launch in three lines for the mobile segment. We are talking about upcoming…

More...
Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Google's Chromebook OS should be updating automatically every six weeks, but Intel doesn't come close with its hardware refresh schedule.

More...
New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

Rumours involving upcoming Nexus devices are nothing uncommon, but this year there is a fair bit of confusion, especially on the…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 13 September 2007 08:07

U.S. Court of Appeals rules against DirecTV

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Exempts researchers and scientists


 

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against satellite television provider DirecTV by ruling that an exception must be made for security and computer science research that is conducted on satellite and smart card technology. 

The cases involved a provision of federal law that prohibits the "assembly" or "modification" of equipment designed to intercept satellite signals. DirecTV had filed legal action against hundreds of thousands of individuals and prosecuted them for illegally intercepting its satellite television signal because they had used smart card technology.  Since there are legal smart card technology uses and DirecTV did not make a distinction between legal and illegal usage, two of the individuals sued by DirecTV appealed the heavy handed legal tactics used by DirecTV.

DirecTV’s claim maintained that the federal law prohibition should apply to anyone working with equipment that is designed to intercept their signals, regardless of their intent or whether any actual interception occurred. Arguments were made on behalf of the individuals by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a non-profit foundation interested in protecting individual freedoms in electronic media under First Amendment and other Constitutional guarantees. 

EFF put forth the argument that the federal law should apply only to entities that make illegal interception possible by other people and should not apply to those who are merely curious about the equipment or are investigating its use for scientific purposes.

To read the full opinion from the 9th Circuit here.

Get more info on the case at the EFF web site here.

Last modified on Thursday, 13 September 2007 10:06

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments