Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 07 September 2007 07:16

Judge rules against part of Patriot Act

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Broadened NSLs violate Constitution


 

In a key ruling on September 6th a U.S. District Court Judge has ruled unconstitutional the amended Patriot Act’s National Security Letter (NSL) provision that allows the FBI to send secret demands/NSLs to electronic communications service providers (ECSPs) demanding access to subscriber or transactional records, to obtain financial and credit documents and to obtain library records about subscribers.

NSLs were allowed prior to 2001 under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, but were supposed to be used only for investigations of terrorists or spies acting on behalf of a foreign power. After enactment of the Patriot Act in 2001, NSLs were given broader authority to request confidential customer information that was “relevant” to an investigation without requiring court approval, and NSLs also required a “gag” order on those who received the request for information.

The federal Judge ruled that the gag provisions were unconstitutional because no prior court approval was required before they were issued, violating the separation of powers provision where judicial matters are reserved solely for the judicial branch of the U.S. government; and that NSLs also violated First Amendment Constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and expression. The U.S. Justice Department did not indicate whether it would appeal the Judge’s ruling.

This ruling should help take the burden off Internet Service Providers, banks, lending institutions and librarians who have been put in the uncomfortable position of having to reveal confidential subscriber information about their customers, and also being unable to discuss it.  The ruling also requires there to be more justification and judicial involvement before such a request for customer confidential information can be required.

Last modified on Friday, 07 September 2007 09:42

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments