Although I'd love to see the GPU eventually winning the controversy, I have a premonition that it's going to be the underdog (similarly to HD-DVD) in the situation, but it won't be entirely cut out of the computing process - it will just serve a different general purpose. My guess is that the multicore CPUs after Larrabee will have around 32 to 64 cores, with a given section of them (1/4 or so) dedicated solely to ray tracing through parallel processing that is directly interlinked to the other main logic cores. In effect, a GPU would be the device in a computing system that would "refine" the CPU processed graphics in a sense as to add depth of perception and realization. So in theory, the computing system would be similar to that of the human mind, only in reverse order:
CPU (processes image through ray tracing and parallel processing techniques and sends to) >> GPU (which translates the image "realistically" by adding detail, texture, effects (non-physics related), and "perception" in a sense)Would anyone agree with this, or am I just going crazy? Can't really tell
