Fudzilla
April 19, 2014, 05:29:03 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Fudzilla Forum is open
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Poll
Question: 0
c - 0 (0%)
c - 0 (0%)
Total Voters: 0

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Seagate Announces 1TB Drives  (Read 11217 times)
javadshahvand
Newbie
*
Posts: 2



View Profile Email
« on: June 27, 2007, 12:54:45 PM »

Code:
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=7822
  Grin
Logged
nemsis
Newbie
*
Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2008, 12:33:57 PM »

thanks

but i prefer if they develop 500GB with 32MB buffer and 10000rpm with cost less than 150$
Logged
TrggrHppy
Newbie
*
Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2008, 05:46:46 PM »

Even after the release of terabyte HDD's i still am a fan of the price/preformance of 500GB drives in raid

Locally, we can get 500GB drives for $99 (Canadian) and 1TB drives for $270

Soo i'd prefer to save some money and go with 2 500GB disks
Logged
greenhorn
Newbie
*
Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2008, 08:39:17 PM »

There are some 750GB Samsung F1 hard drives, which are very fast and quite cheap.  They cost about 100 Eur., which is a fair price I think. They have 32MB Cache.
Logged
fudo
Administrator
Full Member
*****
Posts: 161


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2008, 11:29:24 AM »

yeah Samsung offers 1.5 TB for sub 200, of course you need to buy two drives and each will have 32GB. that sounds like a great deal
Logged
Eliot
Fudzilla Crew
Full Member
*****
Posts: 107


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 15, 2008, 01:59:37 AM »

Meanwhile the Samsung F1 1TB is nearly the price/GB of an 750GB, it's just 1.4ct more expensive...
Of course that adds up to €14 more expensive, but you need less drive to store same amount...
In cases where you can only stick four harddiscs to allow proper airflow, it's 3TB vs 4TB Smiley

And the 1TB has a better price ratio compared to the 640GB drive, which uses only two platters, whereas 750GB and 1TB uses three... for HTPCs 640GB may be the better choice because it should stay cooler.


best,

Eliot
Logged
fwoot
Full Member
***
Posts: 128


rex1234_5@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2008, 12:46:15 AM »

i don't think i could live without my 1T seagate, it's definately the sexiest thing about my computer
Logged
iddoomthree
Newbie
*
Posts: 5



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2008, 01:00:05 PM »

500 x 2 in RAID 0 is better.
bu if u want 2000 gb, then 1000 x 2  Wink
Logged
fwoot
Full Member
***
Posts: 128


rex1234_5@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: April 21, 2008, 02:39:14 PM »

once you've been screwed over by raid it's hard to go back and you don't really need the extra speed when your only using the storage for movies
Logged
manwe
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 72


siavash.sameni
View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: April 21, 2008, 05:49:44 PM »

once you've been screwed over by raid it's hard to go back and you don't really need the extra speed when your only using the storage for movies
I agree , I've got screwed for three time about raid0 !!!
so i won't ever go for it again !!!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!