<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD comes up with Lightning Bolt</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD comes up with Lightning Bolt</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:01:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25552/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>TinHat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37464</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Greed driven ideas always fail. You need cheap early adoption price fix to see the 'longer' term benefits. AMD's idea will both stir the hornets nest, and invite lots of new business. If i licensed Thunderbolt i'd Sell cheap and make lots of profit later, that way you capture the market for years to come. It works well for game consoles and printers. Is it corporate greed or poor insight?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TinHat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:04:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37464</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Memristor says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37349</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The problem is that Intel went all alone and planned on racking in licensing fees with Thunderbold. That pissed of the rest of the industry and know we are seeing competing solutions like Lightning Bold and External PCIe 3.0. I still hope that the PCI-SIG can work with AMD to create a new open standard that is free for all to use.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Memristor</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:25:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37349</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>a1927 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37335</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think you are wrong here. Hardware interface is cheap when it is successful and it is successful when many players adopt it. This announcement dilutes attention to Intel's Thunderbolt. So I think USB3.0 will profit from this announcement and Thunderbolt may loose because vendors will not be certain of wider adoption of Thunderbolt vs competing 'bolts'.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>a1927</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:44:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37335</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Peter Ong says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37316</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thunder & Lightning Bolt, AMD & Intel, Windows & Linux ... good things come ONLY when both of them exist :) Bravo AMD]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Peter Ong</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 03:08:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37316</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>youserzero says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37311</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Maybe it was Paul Otellini quote or something? He considers Itanium to be a success so who knows what other goofy stuff he would say...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>youserzero</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:50:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37311</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>takethis says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37300</link>
			<description><![CDATA[lightning = light thunder = sound light faster than sound or it seems someone has had too much MTG]]></description>
			<dc:creator>takethis</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:33:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37300</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DaRAGE says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37298</link>
			<description><![CDATA[How is it fail? It's like $1 compared to $30. Delivering still quite fast USB 3 speeds]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DaRAGE</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:01:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37298</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>las says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37295</link>
			<description><![CDATA[fail.......]]></description>
			<dc:creator>las</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:23:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37295</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The blue fox says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37290</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There calling it Lightning Bolt? They could not think up a better name. Look's like they just merged Display port with USB 3.0. Then named it Lightning Bolt so people believe it's like thunder bolt.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The blue fox</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:21:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25552-amd-comes-up-with-lightning-bolt#comment-37290</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
