<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel smartphone benchmarked</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel smartphone benchmarked</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25527-intel-smartphone-benchmarked</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:17:12 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25527/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Memristor says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25527-intel-smartphone-benchmarked#comment-37238</link>
			<description><![CDATA[and they know how to twist a few arms. Just ask AMD]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Memristor</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:07:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25527-intel-smartphone-benchmarked#comment-37238</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ramcoza says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25527-intel-smartphone-benchmarked#comment-37201</link>
			<description><![CDATA[All the benchmarks suck.. Here is another.. :P http://www.anandtech.com/show/5365/intels-medfield-atom-z2460-arrive-for-smartphones As far as I remember, only part Atom SoCs did suck were it's GPU performance and power consumption. But they have corrected the both and they are right back on the track.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ramcoza</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:59:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25527-intel-smartphone-benchmarked#comment-37201</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Haberlandt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25527-intel-smartphone-benchmarked#comment-37198</link>
			<description><![CDATA[BenchmarkPi sucks...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Haberlandt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:16:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25527-intel-smartphone-benchmarked#comment-37198</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>evolucion8 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25527-intel-smartphone-benchmarked#comment-37194</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Antitrust lawsuit?, cough cough cough.....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>evolucion8</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:01:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25527-intel-smartphone-benchmarked#comment-37194</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FakeJ says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25527-intel-smartphone-benchmarked#comment-37178</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is only a fail if this is the last mobile chip Intel makes, but with this being Intel, they will release better and better versions of the chip a a more rapid pace than the competition. I'm no fanboy but to count Intel out is crazy. They have excellent engineers, gobs of cash, OEM relationships, and they own the fabs (the most advanced in the world) that manufacture the chips. They control 80% of the Desktop/mobile chip market for a reason.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>FakeJ</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:59:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25527-intel-smartphone-benchmarked#comment-37178</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thematrix606 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25527-intel-smartphone-benchmarked#comment-37168</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Intel fail is fail. Thank you.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thematrix606</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:31:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25527-intel-smartphone-benchmarked#comment-37168</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
