<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Ivy Bridge faces yield issues</title>
		<description>Discuss Ivy Bridge faces yield issues</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25429-ivy-bridge-faces-yield-issues</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:33:23 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25429/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>spp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25429-ivy-bridge-faces-yield-issues#comment-36927</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow even Intel have yield problems!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>spp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 13:00:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25429-ivy-bridge-faces-yield-issues#comment-36927</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25429-ivy-bridge-faces-yield-issues#comment-36847</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's just the start of the end of silicon... probably no one predicted that the closer they got to the end the more costly it would get. All though they would just advance until that limiting wall was hit. Dumb. Anyway, G-FET... we are awaiting you, pick up the pace please.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 03:34:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25429-ivy-bridge-faces-yield-issues#comment-36847</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nECrO says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25429-ivy-bridge-faces-yield-issues#comment-36809</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bingo. Give the man a cigar. It's nice to see someone understands the physics and the massive challenges of each shrink. It was getting old seeing ppl post this or that company sucks because they are having issues at a given die shrink.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nECrO</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:54:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25429-ivy-bridge-faces-yield-issues#comment-36809</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nubstick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25429-ivy-bridge-faces-yield-issues#comment-36808</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just goes to show you that no one is immune to the ever increasing complexity of these processes. TSMC's 40nm was late, 28nm late GF's 32nm suffered (still suffering?) yield problems. And now Intel's 22nm yield problems, even though they would never admit it themselves.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nubstick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:50:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25429-ivy-bridge-faces-yield-issues#comment-36808</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Zone says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25429-ivy-bridge-faces-yield-issues#comment-36788</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ermm why do you say "luckily" in that sentence? Having yield issues and not feeling pressure to do something about it is a good thing in your book? I want Ivy bridge up and running preferably as soon as possible thank you very much.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Zone</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:01:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25429-ivy-bridge-faces-yield-issues#comment-36788</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>robert3892 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25429-ivy-bridge-faces-yield-issues#comment-36782</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Luckily Intel is in no hurry as it faces no serious competition at this time. I doubt if AMD can step in and take any market share during the delay.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>robert3892</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:57:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25429-ivy-bridge-faces-yield-issues#comment-36782</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
