<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Asustek cuts motherboard production</title>
		<description>Discuss Asustek cuts motherboard production</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:15:02 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25404/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36844</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well ASUX, that's what happens when your products quality drops and you neglect your users. Same thing goes for the other two. I'm switching to ASRock from now, better deals that don't involve "charging a premium for quality". And a big FU for not respecting my warranty, bitches!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 03:20:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36844</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>buxcador says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36737</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I blame Intel. By force to buy a new mother with each processor update, it makes the entire update too costly and risky.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>buxcador</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:46:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36737</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>karlsbad says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36728</link>
			<description><![CDATA[One reason they cut back has to be Intel's new plan of ditching processors after only one year or so. Now's the time on 'Sockets' vend vee d@nce! The SB chipsets, are => important as the CPU. I.E. I have to have SATA3, PCIe 3, USB 3 and then, 3+ PCIe 16x slots, 8x, 4x, 400+ GB SSD Primary HD (which may do more for frame rates than a new video AIB), etc. You've probably guessed, I've been waiting for Ivy Bridge for a long long time. I really resent how Intel piecemeals features which don't have all that much to do with the CPU gen per se. It's a real task to figure which motherboard uses what "old" codenamed chipset and CPU; it's what I wanted or the other flavor? I'm glad that Chipzilla is dropping kit quickly. When R.O.G. model names don't change with onboard spec -confusing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>karlsbad</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:55:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36728</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36727</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Q1 is always slow and Q4 is always demanding. Doesn't this happen every year?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:53:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36727</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36726</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If that board was brand new all you really had to do was wait for a BIOS update. In the meantime you could have relaxed the timing and bumped the voltage. I'm sure it would have worked. This is a common problem with all new motherboards. Especially when a new chipset is released.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:51:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36726</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jklauderdale says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36722</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I knew the RAM was good, I knew the motherboard functioned with my old 2X2GB Corsair kit. I stopped buying Asus for the same reason I don't purchase (or pirate) DRM laden games, on sheer principle. Why buy from someone who leaves a bad taste in your mouth when there are cheaper and "friendlier" options available who are just as stable?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jklauderdale</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:36:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36722</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36721</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You never said if you RMA'd and tried the kit you got back. QVL lists for RAM are only useful if you're paranoid. I'm currently unning RipjawsX 8GB 1600MHz @ 1866MHz on ASUS P8P67 EVO right now, no problems ever. Before that i had Ripjaws 4GB 1600MHz kit on P5K-E 775 socket board, again no problems. Only a fool would stop buying a product over one bad experience.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:18:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36721</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>mrgerbik says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36719</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I agree - but in all fairness, all motherboards that I know of have RAM QVL lists... ASUS has definitely left a bad taste in my mouth with the last couple motherboards Ive owned - and I too had switched over to Gigabyte ... although i took one last chance with the Sabertooth 990FX and after mucking around with finicky settings for hours upon hours to get things working right, I finally got things stable and all seems well... the only reason I ditched Gigabyte this time around was because of UFEI (shallow I know) - next board will be a Gigabyte thou for sure]]></description>
			<dc:creator>mrgerbik</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:46:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36719</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jklauderdale says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36713</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Couldn't care less. I stopped using Asus mainboards after I tried to install G Skill RAM that I KNEW was good into one of their boards and it didn't work. I got an email back from Asus saying that they don't support that set of RAM so, if it didn't work, oh well. Been using Gigabyte boards since then and found them to be just as flawless and usually cheaper. Not to mention I've never had an issue with incompatible RAM :-| Bottom Line: No one should be able to dictate what parts you can and can not use in a system you build yourself.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jklauderdale</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:22:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25404-asustek-cuts-motherboard-production#comment-36713</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
