<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel to use Broadcom and TI chips with Medfield platform</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel to use Broadcom and TI chips with Medfield platform</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25383-intel-to-use-broadcom-and-ti-chips-with-medfield-platform</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:01:48 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25383/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>PorscheRacer14 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25383-intel-to-use-broadcom-and-ti-chips-with-medfield-platform#comment-36586</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And right there, with the feature support for x86 is more appealing than ARM. ARM will have to step it up if it wants the SoC market for itself in smartphones and such.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PorscheRacer14</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 18:06:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25383-intel-to-use-broadcom-and-ti-chips-with-medfield-platform#comment-36586</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
