<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Core i5 3470T is Ivy Bridge dual at 35W</title>
		<description>Discuss Core i5 3470T is Ivy Bridge dual at 35W</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25366-core-i5-3470t-is-ivy-bridge-dual-at-35w</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:51:38 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25366/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>fteoath64 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25366-core-i5-3470t-is-ivy-bridge-dual-at-35w#comment-36653</link>
			<description><![CDATA[These are mobile chips and you do get more Ghz for less power at the same old price!. The turbo delta of close to 1Ghz is impressive and with good power management, it will maximize battery life as well no matter what you do. If you want serious power, get a multichip SB-E server and rock your app.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>fteoath64</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:47:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25366-core-i5-3470t-is-ivy-bridge-dual-at-35w#comment-36653</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dishayu says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25366-core-i5-3470t-is-ivy-bridge-dual-at-35w#comment-36494</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I really don't get this approach. Pretty sure that most would rather have a higher power consuming and higher performing processor at this price point. Even if i ignore the fact that no one really cares about an additional 20W or so for higher performance (note that idle power consumption wouldn't vary by all that much with maximum power consumption). Anyone looking for an HTPC doesn't need this kind of power and anyone who DOES need this kind of power could definitely do with some more even if it consumes a bit more electricity. I'm not opposed to power savings, but i think that the approach should be "higher performance at same consumption" rather than "same performance at lower consumption", for desktop parts at least. Just my 2 cents.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dishayu</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:34:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25366-core-i5-3470t-is-ivy-bridge-dual-at-35w#comment-36494</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
