<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel Anti-Trust case goes to New York</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel Anti-Trust case goes to New York</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:02:28 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25344/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>nECrO says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36482</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Exactly. And Intel has been up to it's tricks longer than that. They also pulled out all the stops and in some cases sold at a loss when AMD was the most dominant and was in a position to take a huge amount of market share if not for Intel's Illegal actions.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nECrO</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 07:24:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36482</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>123s says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36467</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hope they gotta pay more than the change money they had to pay before. 8 to 12 billions sounds pretty nice.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123s</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:46:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36467</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>redisnidma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36462</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I doubt that's the case. Remember one thing: AMD have being developing Bulldozer for almost 7 years now. There's simply no excuse for such low performance.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redisnidma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:24:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36462</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36434</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hope Intel gets nailed in the pocket book in Billions upon Billions. Maybe then they will learn a hard lesson and finally play nice. Bulldozer was the fault of AMD's management pulling out much needed R&D. Reason why they pulled money from there is due to Intel screwing AMD in securing good contracts? Perhaps? Who Knows?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:45:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36434</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>fteoath64 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36433</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, BullDozer might have been a 12 core chip with 12MB sec cache, 64MB L3 cache performing 2.5 times i7 at the same price. Then Intel would have to sell i7 at $99 instead of their current price levels.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>fteoath64</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:00:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36433</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nECrO says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36411</link>
			<description><![CDATA[While I agree with most of your comment, I will disagree with the statement that Intel didn't hurt AMD much. In reality, they damn near castrated them and in doing so screwed consumers world wide. Who can say what Bulldozer might have been if Intel hadn't played dirty and robbed AMD of billions in R&D money....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nECrO</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:37:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36411</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36407</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ah US is late and I think they wont rule it out. EU, Japan, and South Korea already found Intel guilty but in US...hmmm maybe we will wait 32 cores or more to come out in consumer market but still no ruling. In more accurate logic, they don't hurt AMD much but rather the consumer. It is like buying substandard housing at premium price.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:45:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36407</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>redisnidma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36406</link>
			<description><![CDATA[IMHO about this particular case, Intel had a lot more to loose than the 1.2 billion they settled with AMD. I could bet you any day that if found guilty (which they are), they would be forced to pay a fine of 8 to 12 billion dollars (more or less). Anyhow, AMD settling things up with intel means that they're free of any charge, right?? :roll:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redisnidma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:43:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36406</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36404</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Think they'll top the 1 billion figure? More precisely 1,3 billion USD, if the EU exchange rate doesn't slip some more.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:15:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36404</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>saneblane says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36398</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Score 1, for the little guys.They make good processors now, but what they did was slow the entire industry down, we might have long passed this level of performance if Amd was given a fair playing field back in the day.New york,I want you to fcuk Intel up,it's been a long time coming.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>saneblane</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:26:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25344-intel-anti-trust-case-goes-to-new-york#comment-36398</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
