<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Medfield performance leaked, looks impressive </title>
		<description>Discuss Medfield performance leaked, looks impressive </description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:53:09 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25338/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>STRESS says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36450</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Medallish Welcome to the world of consumerism we are already way beyond the point of making up needs we don't have. Tablet and smartphones are among them. They are utterly useless.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>STRESS</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:54:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36450</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Medallish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36438</link>
			<description><![CDATA[+999 This a million times over, I was telling people I didn't see the point of Quad core cell phones, I mean my god a single core can already do slight multithreading, a dual core should be enough there's only so much you can do on a phone, with a PC you have a workstation, you can have things to run in the background, you don't have the platform, or the need to do that on a phone, yeah push technology, but don't make up needs we don't have.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Medallish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:08:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36438</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36418</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You all sound like idiots. Nothing new.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 19:34:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36418</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ajvitaly says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36402</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Even with a 32nm node process advantage over Tegra 3, and assuming Intel can hit their power draw goals, it still consumes 8 times more power at idle and 5 times more power under load. On top of that, it's slower than Tegra 3. What phone manufacturer would want this? There will be plenty of 28nm ARM processors out by then, probably with better performance than Tegra 3 in apps that aren't deeply threaded and will have lower power usage than Tegra under load. Even Nvidia will have shrunk Tegra 3 down to 28nm, making it all the more attractive. Intel is way behind.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ajvitaly</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:37:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36402</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>saneblane says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36395</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You might be right about that, If Intel makes arm chips and fabs them in house they would always have a process advantage and have a lower power consumption chip. They are beating the life out of x86 it's getting ridiculous now.Intel has been an Arm licensee for a long time now, they can make Arm chip tomorrow if they wanted to, or better yet they can become the preferred Fabricator for 22nm and beyond Arm chips, Tsmc and Glofo is not going to have an answer for intel anytime soon.Intel and Amd should partner up on an arm ship, with both teams designing the cpu, and Amd providing the graphics and intel fabbing it on 22nm,that chip would scare the bejjessus out of everyone.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>saneblane</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:04:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36395</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nt300 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36390</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I can see AMD competing for this market over Intel. Intel's arrogance is the problem.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nt300</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:02:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36390</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Memristor says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36385</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Intel's only chance in this segment is the 20 and 14nm process. That's when they will be able to increase performance substantially and all with much lower power requirements. But that is not due until late 2014 or even 2015. Two to three years for ARM to come out with another faster SoC that supports 64bit and multiple CPU's. The race is definitely on.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Memristor</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:07:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36385</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hybry says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36383</link>
			<description><![CDATA[+1 The performace at the moment is sufficient for most users but they should concentrate on making more efficient SoC to increase the battery life.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hybry</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:46:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36383</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nele says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36380</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think that beejeesus stuff was sarcasm...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nele</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:22:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36380</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>muziqaz says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36378</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@maroon1, are you nuts? is Medfield already released? Do we have any devices with it? No. So I think it would be obvious to compare it with also unreleased but announced competing products. Scare bejeezus out of everyone - what a joke :D By the way, my gripe with ALL the mobile device manufacturers is that they now concentrate on perfromance, but batery is left behind. I would gladly have a smartphone which holds 5 days on heavy use, not 1 day like my current Nexus S. nvidia should get kick in the head with their campaign about quad core is the best, and idiots are following them announcing quad cores left and right. Give me a frikkin longer battery life not quad cores.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>muziqaz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:08:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25338-medfield-performance-leaked-looks-impressive#comment-36378</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
