<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Ivy Bridge goes 300MHz faster at same TDP</title>
		<description>Discuss Ivy Bridge goes 300MHz faster at same TDP</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25300-ivy-bridge-goes-300mhz-faster-at-same-tdp</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:32:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25300/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Jay says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25300-ivy-bridge-goes-300mhz-faster-at-same-tdp#comment-36140</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yeah who uses integrated graphics anyway? Some retard like you or HTPC/Small-form factor guys. You put in a $50 graphics card & it will destroy any APU from ur precious AMD fagtroll. Oh & hey if you use Lucid virtu software u can also run both Intel+AMD GPU..and take Advantage of Intel QuickSync which works much better than AMD's App Accelaration shit & Nvidias CUDA shit which needs propreitary software to be taken advantage off. Your shameful how you type ur statement making it look like Intel is still weak...well AMD blows & it's CPU are heaters & non enviroment friendly & blow! Take That!! :@ http://scalibq.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/yes-amd-fanboys-are-idiots/ = ur EXPOSED!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:06:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25300-ivy-bridge-goes-300mhz-faster-at-same-tdp#comment-36140</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25300-ivy-bridge-goes-300mhz-faster-at-same-tdp#comment-36126</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Specs for the Ivy Bridge look good. Not sure about the graphics though. That is where AMD will win.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:12:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25300-ivy-bridge-goes-300mhz-faster-at-same-tdp#comment-36126</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>trajan2448 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25300-ivy-bridge-goes-300mhz-faster-at-same-tdp#comment-36124</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just bought an Intel 2600. Its a monster. These Ivy Bridges should be great.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>trajan2448</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:49:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25300-ivy-bridge-goes-300mhz-faster-at-same-tdp#comment-36124</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>maroon1 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25300-ivy-bridge-goes-300mhz-faster-at-same-tdp#comment-36102</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Keep in mind that ivy bridge is going to have about 10% increase in IPC]]></description>
			<dc:creator>maroon1</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:58:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25300-ivy-bridge-goes-300mhz-faster-at-same-tdp#comment-36102</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
