<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>HD 7970 up to 60 percent faster than GTX 580</title>
		<description>Discuss HD 7970 up to 60 percent faster than GTX 580</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:25:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25278/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>NickThePrick says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36283</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, thumb it down all you want, the benches are out now, no where do I see 50%...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>NickThePrick</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 19:22:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36283</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>HPC Master says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36186</link>
			<description><![CDATA[OK, let's summ it up... what is left from AMD Paper Launch Propaganda? Overall it's only 15-20% faster in real World Gaming Benchmarks, than one year old Nvidia GTX580, that's the truth - NOT 60%! Read by yourself: http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/49646-amd-radeon-hd-7970-3gb-review-13.html /// http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_7970/9.html]]></description>
			<dc:creator>HPC Master</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:11:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36186</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>saneblane says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36154</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Your just another idiot who crawled out of kim jung-il's ass when he died. i said that anything over 30fps is good fun in most games, which is why consoles use that fps,my pc does 1080p native with higher texture, lighting and still has playable fps.Just because 2 people has the same card doesn't mean your going to have same results,other components plays a big part in final game experience.And what is or isn't playable is an objective thing, i can play with 30fps just fine all day while some people can't.Before u call anyone a noob,at least think it through.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>saneblane</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:50:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36154</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thematrix606 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36150</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ok idiot of the day. Bringing consoles when talking about PC video cards that are a few generations newer, is like talking about Jet planes, then some noob comes along (you) and brags about how their propeller plane is enough. You get my point? Go play Skyrim, BF3, hell even SWtOR. All released within the last few days/weeks, even without MSAA, you can't run it at playable FPS ALL THE TIME on max. Of course if I look at the sky or the ground it will be ok -.- Now if you can't notice the difference between 24 fps and 60, then you're just a [censored]ing idiot. Amen.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thematrix606</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:41:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36150</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>saneblane says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36130</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You do realise that their are millions upon millions of people with consoles who would beg to differ,60 fps on every game would be nice but fps always dips and for most games over 30fps is good fun. And most of what you say is just rediculous.8msaa is not a needed on 1080p and MSAA is what affects fps the most when on, I will say it again my radeon 6950, with 8 gigs of ram and ssd drive,I5 2500 can max out any game out their on 1080p and still be playable. I am going to upgrade but it's not because of bad gpu perfomance. it's because am thirsty for something new]]></description>
			<dc:creator>saneblane</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:48:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36130</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>godrilla says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36120</link>
			<description><![CDATA[its all good i dont get nervous like some trolls here i think its placed there by purpose ( clocks and ram is right) performance seems on par better than classified gtx 580 but worse than gtx 560 x2 we shall see when it launches for sure]]></description>
			<dc:creator>godrilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:09:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36120</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nconst says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36119</link>
			<description><![CDATA[godrilla 2011-12-21 17:29 Sorry for misunderstandin g. Probably it's a typo error, but I have serious doubt about all "performance" sources from amd! And note that there isn't any info such transistor count, die area!? They are important and points some indirect clues about the "quality" of the claimed performance!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nconst</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:56:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36119</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>godrilla says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36118</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Did you even look at my link has nothing to do with slides its a comparison of the gtx 580 class vs matrix and the 7970 in amongst those by legitreviews web! Lol Its the 4th gpu from the top says hd 7970 3 gigs @ 925/5500]]></description>
			<dc:creator>godrilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:29:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36118</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nconst says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36116</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I saw it, and I agree with DarkPhoenix 2011-12-21 14:07! The story here is looks like amds bulldozer performance diagrams, before the catastrophe in the reality!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nconst</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:26:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36116</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>godrilla says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36109</link>
			<description><![CDATA[http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1802/11/ Is this an typo error 7970 in review? Vs classified and matrix gtx 580]]></description>
			<dc:creator>godrilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:46:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25278-hd-7970-up-to-60-percent-faster-than-gtx-580#comment-36109</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
