<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD Radeon HD 7970 slide leaks</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD Radeon HD 7970 slide leaks</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:47:01 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25231/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Cartman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35817</link>
			<description><![CDATA[925 Mhz core clock? HD 4890 OC-ed edition where 1 Ghz out of the box by MSI and few other partners and HD 4890 is 55 nm. Also still 32 rops? And 384 bit bus, time will tell... but this sounds strange to me. If its truth about 384 bit, memory bandwidth should be around 264 GB/sec, damn that sounds like rocket.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cartman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 11:23:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35817</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>evolucion8 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35814</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ok, that says it all. Let the real geeks do the hardware reviews and opinion, do what you do best, getting pounded on your rear, bastard. You seems to forget the FX 5800 Faux, the multiple renames of the same G92 chip, the Fermi woodscrew crap, the bumpgate issue, the broken video decoder of the NV40, the burnt 8800/9800 series due to a driver bug, nVidia is no saint either, want to buy something holly according to you, for sure you are an apple user. Just do what you do best fatso.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>evolucion8</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:13:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35814</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jay says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35801</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No I will not stop until my final breath to EXPOSE AMD & every other company if they are WRONG for saying LIES to mislead the consumer. Ok I'm a chinese gay but I don't even have an nvidia card idiot I have a HD6670 now, my next card will be nvidia coz it will be 28nm for mainstream too unlike CHEATERS AMD who only gonna make 79xx series 28nm! You guys rate me down all you want but the TRUTH will not stay SILENT, one day it will COME OUT & burn all you AMD FAG TROLLS in it's PATH & EXPOSE u & AMD's BLACK SATANIC activites!!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 00:53:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35801</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>evolucion8 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35755</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Certainly doubt it, according to those slides, the HD 7970 will be at least 50% faster than HD 6970 in the worst case scenario, and considering that the HD 6970 is snipping the heels of the GTX 580 with recent driver improvements, the 20% advantage that the GTX 580 had over the HD 6970 is now between 5-15%, so I say that the HD 7970 should be at least 35% faster in the worst case scenario, with driver improvements, that gap will increase.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>evolucion8</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:29:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35755</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>spp says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35751</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Then what about your NVIDIA, faking their TDP ratings.If NVIDIA says 115w TDP the actual consumption would be more than 150W.How much money you get from NVIDIA for praising them you CHINESE gay. No matter how many time you say Shitdozzer, you cant hurt the reputation of AMD and there products.You are wasting your energy man. :lol:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>spp</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:18:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35751</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>STRESS says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35746</link>
			<description><![CDATA[3W idle that's a target nVidia will not reach even in a million years]]></description>
			<dc:creator>STRESS</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:28:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35746</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>las says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35744</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm not sure im going AMD again, their drivers are still very bad imo. I pre-ordered like 10 games this year, most of them have been failing on my AMD setup the first weeks/months. Some still isnt fixed. They should really improve their drivers. Something tells me nVidia is better to communicate with game devs etc. Because they almost never have problems on release date.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>las</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:31:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35744</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdfighter says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35742</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Looks beastly. That high memory frequency with 384-bit bandwidth will offer great performance: the GTX 580 has the memory clocked at 3,8 GHz, with 320-bit bandwidth. Now we just have to hope the so called ground up built GPU is good... But I have slight reservations, since the last thing they built from ground up was Bulldozer.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdfighter</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:14:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35742</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>HBeam says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35737</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ohohoho. 7970 will be launched on 22 December 2011. That's the shit. Although I really don't like leaked perfomance benches. Like 20% more than GTX 580. Not good.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>HBeam</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:32:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35737</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>HBeam says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35736</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Moar slides: http://semiaccurate.com/forums/showpost.php?p=145337&postcount=2113]]></description>
			<dc:creator>HBeam</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:22:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25231-amd-radeon-hd-7970-slide-leaks#comment-35736</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
