<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD working on ultrabook-like designs </title>
		<description>Discuss AMD working on ultrabook-like designs </description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:07:26 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25173/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35545</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I would have to disagree. The "feeling" is totally different. They are two different types of products that do not compete.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:19:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35545</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Medallish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35523</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Considering that "feeling" wise there's not much difference between a 18W Zacate, and a 17W ULV from Intel, this is probably going to work really well, and with the better graphics on AMD's much cheaper option, AMD could definitely compete with Ultrabooks, sure it might not be as fast as Sandy Bridge, but as I said you can't feel it in most cases, and you get it for a fraction of the price, personally I'm hoping for a 17-20W, one or two Module Trinity to make a appearence in this sector.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Medallish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:45:39 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35523</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35516</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Since AMD specifically designed Brazos to compete with Atom and not Ivy Bridge I would say that it is logical.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:44:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35516</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35488</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Triple facepalm! Is anyone going to make a logical comment this week?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 03:02:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35488</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35481</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Good luck with that strategy. Brazos is a damned terrible competitor to Ivy Bridge.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:19:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35481</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>saneblane says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35479</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Apple made the Air and was open with intel because intel was not a computer maker, and they were telling them the kind of processor that the Air should have, and were showing them why it was important for the cpu to be cool. Get your facts right before you dispute anyone, Double *facepalm*.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>saneblane</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:21:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35479</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>D31337Antics says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35475</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Intel helped them design and create the macbook air *face palm*]]></description>
			<dc:creator>D31337Antics</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:31:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35475</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>saneblane says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35474</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is just stupid, Intel did what they always do, they stole someone's else idea and form factor (Apple macbook air) and called it something else, why can't that company do anything other than X86, it's getting rediculous now.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>saneblane</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:13:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25173-amd-working-on-ultrabook-like-designs#comment-35474</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
