<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD disses GPUs with CPU sockets</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD disses GPUs with CPU sockets</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25172-amd-disses-gpus-with-cpu-sockets</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:29:37 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25172/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Stormkroe says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25172-amd-disses-gpus-with-cpu-sockets#comment-35489</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think it's great when these huge companies make absolute statements. It gives us something to laugh at later when they're seen to miss the boat. 3dFX "Transform and Lighting has nothing on our T-buffer" Intel "X86 is dead and extending it to 64-bit is pointless and something we'll never do." General Motors "We should be careful with our spending, we might have to file bankruptcy and it's not like someone's just gonna GIVE us the money to get out of debt."]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stormkroe</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 03:04:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25172-amd-disses-gpus-with-cpu-sockets#comment-35489</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dew111 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25172-amd-disses-gpus-with-cpu-sockets#comment-35477</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I hope you're joking. From a programmer's point of view this may be the case, but performance per watt would beg to differ. The x86 ISA is a deal-breaker as it requires a lot of fetch and decode circuitry. RISC-like GPUs are much better because they can fetch and decode with a tiny percentage of the circuitry needed for x86. In any case, upcoming GPUs from Nvidia and AMD are featuring x86-addressable vRAM. This should bring many of the benefits of x86 coprocessors without the ISA's baggage.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dew111</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:03:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25172-amd-disses-gpus-with-cpu-sockets#comment-35477</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Haberlandt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25172-amd-disses-gpus-with-cpu-sockets#comment-35473</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'd love CPUs to use PCI-E slots. No more socket compatibility issues.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Haberlandt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:39:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25172-amd-disses-gpus-with-cpu-sockets#comment-35473</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25172-amd-disses-gpus-with-cpu-sockets#comment-35466</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I recall back in 2002/2003 that AMD was making hay about that the hypertransport interconnect supported using FPGAs as compute accelerators in socket 940 multiprocessor boards along with Opterons.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:37:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25172-amd-disses-gpus-with-cpu-sockets#comment-35466</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25172-amd-disses-gpus-with-cpu-sockets#comment-35463</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I always though that have a GPU that could x86 compute would be the most efficient and powerful kind of APU and would be a true fussion of CPU and GPU]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:59:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25172-amd-disses-gpus-with-cpu-sockets#comment-35463</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
