<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Kindle Fire second only to iPad</title>
		<description>Discuss Kindle Fire second only to iPad</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25098-kindle-fire-second-only-to-ipad</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:15:02 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25098/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>olafbrows says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25098-kindle-fire-second-only-to-ipad#comment-35164</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The Kindle is really second only to the iPad but consider the cost of the Fire. The Fire cost approx. $200. Amazon is banking on people to use the features on the Fire such as Amazon Prime. I personally prefer the iPad because I can share all the apps and books I bought with up to 5 devices. I got my Fire at http://spindlekindle.com and it was just as cheap as Amazon but they give me a warranty.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>olafbrows</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:20:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25098-kindle-fire-second-only-to-ipad#comment-35164</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
