<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel won’t subsidize ultrabooks</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel won’t subsidize ultrabooks</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25091-intel-won’t-subsidize-ultrabooks</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:39:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25091/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>JAB Creations says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25091-intel-won’t-subsidize-ultrabooks#comment-35136</link>
			<description><![CDATA[On the upside at least Intel wastes their vast resources on unpopular markets keeping them exceptionally non-competitive with AMD. On the downside it means more unwanted stuff will sit around using up more space. Just think of it, in thousands of years people might explore beneath the surface of the Earth and discover huge warehouses of unused products that were never sold. Think I saw an anime series with something like that once...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JAB Creations</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:18:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25091-intel-won’t-subsidize-ultrabooks#comment-35136</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fud_u says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25091-intel-won’t-subsidize-ultrabooks#comment-35114</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This is what you get for not having competition.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fud_u</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 10:19:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25091-intel-won’t-subsidize-ultrabooks#comment-35114</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
