<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel partners have Ivy Bridge boards</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel partners have Ivy Bridge boards</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 06:51:57 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25086/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Jay says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35126</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes you are 100% correct. Intel is not launching replacement for H61 chipset i.e H71, the entry level. H67 v/s H77 = H77 has built-in USB3 & smart response tech if u use SSD as caching. Both are useless coz if u buy SSD why u wanna use it for cache only better as a boot drive & 98% of H67 chipset boards come with USB3.0 ports even Intels own H67 boards have USB3 ports! Intel will get greedy & not issue BIOS update for their own line of H67 chipsets im sure. Some partners might also back-track on support for Ivy Bridge on H67 but this is a 50-50.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 20:34:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35126</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>maroon1 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35119</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What you are talking about ?! Ivy bridge is going to work with current LGA 1155 motherboard with bios update]]></description>
			<dc:creator>maroon1</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 16:25:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35119</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35087</link>
			<description><![CDATA[New board again..............wooot! Every year they have new chipset, every year the Intel user gets obsolete, every year Intel is making money out of them, e very year new idiot is born, sounds like infinity.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:03:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35087</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fidovoff says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35051</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I was thinking about new products at release/beginning, Intel tends to overprice their newest things a lot to begin with, and lowering prices around after half a year, to something more sensible. About Fusion Piledriver vs Ivy Bridge is hard to say, afik AMD will be using a newer Bulldozer design than the current one in Piledriver, hopefully they'll give each other an hard competition next year, and daddy needs a cheap good HTPC :p]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fidovoff</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:08:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35051</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35049</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sorry but Intel has plenty of low priced $50-$140 Sandy Bridge chips for sale. AMD's Fusion is priced in that same exact range. Intel's upcoming Ivy Bridge will be competing with AMD's upcoming Piledriver in that same mainstream $50-$140 price range. AMD will loose on the CPU side but hopefully they can integrate a much better GPU without power consumption going off the charts, that's where AMD has some serious problems. Any advantage Fusion had in a faster GPU will be nullified till Piledriver. Except that Piledriver will *STILL* be on a 32nm process while Ivy will be 22nm. That's a major problem for AMD.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:42:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35049</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fidovoff says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35046</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You forgot to mention Intel will rape your wallet :) Also when P67 and H67 came, they had defective transistor/chips, hurray! Lets see if they can release something not broken or overpriced his time...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fidovoff</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:17:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35046</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>faildozzer  says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35040</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Little fix: "..and ONCE AGAIN you will get better performance, better battery and overall better platform to dominate notebooks and ALL desktops in 2012-13-14-15 and so on" RIP amd and they "optimistic" fagboys :D Oh dear..dan amd fagboy must be dying from news like this AHAHAHAHA]]></description>
			<dc:creator>faildozzer </dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:53:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25086-intel-partners-have-ivy-bridge-boards#comment-35040</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
