<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Ivy Bridge official benchmarks leaked</title>
		<description>Discuss Ivy Bridge official benchmarks leaked</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:37:25 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25070/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>muddocktor says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-35108</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I wish nele would get back into an account banning mood again and ban warrior/fagboy/faildozer again. This site was so much nicer to read when he last banned the friggin trolls out of here. Instead we got to read through garbage like this shitbird posted above. WTF does this post or the post the idiot (faildozer) quoted even have to do with AMD? He's just a fuggin retard. As for Ivy Bridge, I might upgrade when they come out if they overclock better than SB.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>muddocktor</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 08:40:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-35108</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>crackerz says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-35011</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@faildozzer Keep up paying hunders of dollars/euros for just a cpu, I'll keep on paying a few dollars/euros to amd. Less performance than intel? sure, but way better performarce for my money(cheaper mobos too) Have a fail day :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>crackerz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:28:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-35011</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>majorpayne says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-34998</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It looks like the Warriordiot Kid/gay_fist/Fagbots is now renting to an cafe just to troll here in fudzilla. Well what can we expect from a trash because it's everywhere to be found.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>majorpayne</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:13:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-34998</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-34995</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ faildozzer on par means equal to. maroon1 just commented that ivy bridge is faster than SB and not equal. You are the fanboi here... pity]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:21:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-34995</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>roberto.tomas says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-34989</link>
			<description><![CDATA[its not going to be pure pci3? pcisig just announced pci4 was nearing finalization and *next year's* processor isnt fully on 3 yet.. about the 7%-30% "contradictory" performance bump -- 30% was what they were saying earlier in the year, its nothing to turn away from, but 7% is pretty ho-hum for the die shrink. (compare to arm usually getting 50%, and intel's own talk of getting 50% improvement in haswell)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>roberto.tomas</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:24:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-34989</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>faildozzer  says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-34987</link>
			<description><![CDATA[LOL - do you even understand english and whats writen? Or did you just read first 5 words? Anyways - amd fagboys now gonna start talking awhat Fudzilla writing,since they cant talk about $hitdozzer as its EPIC FAILURE :D R.I.P amd and they cpu department (especially they clueless engineers) P.S.i love amd fagboys and they never ending "optimism" :D :D :D :D :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>faildozzer </dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:55:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-34987</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>maroon1 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-34986</link>
			<description><![CDATA[LOL !! Fudzilla is contradicting itself. They say that is on par with SB, but the benchmarks shows that Ivy bridge is performing better (the improvements in CPU benchmarks range from 7% to 25%)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>maroon1</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:25:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25070-ivy-bridge-official-benchmarks-leaked#comment-34986</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
