<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD CEO believes in first-to-market</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD CEO believes in first-to-market</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:00:34 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25068/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>DurkaDu says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35202</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Third - More and more games use 4-6 cores(Battlefie ld 3), but no one use more. In a year maybe games will start to utilize 8+ cores? That's what AMD is betting for - a futures where game & applications uses MANY cores. In that future they would do well, as they offer a very low cost per core. Autumn 2012 will be a VERY important time for AMD and its fans. Windows 8 will be out, Piledriver as well and hopefully games that uses more of AMD's tech. Meaning no more exudes.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DurkaDu</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 02:15:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35202</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DurkaDu says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35201</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think that Bulldozer has many problems but also great potential. First: It's a totally new architecture. All 1.0 products comes with some initial problems. Second - Windows 7 doesn't support it to the fullest. A patch will hopefully be released soon. Worst case scenario; we will have to wait for Windows 8 to harness all Bulldozers juicy hidden powers.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DurkaDu</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 02:14:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35201</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kiyoshi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35069</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Debatable technicalities. It's the performance that counts though, and from that perspective, it looks a lot more like a quad core. AMD still competes on price though. I am glad they do, or else Intel's mid-range would have the same ridiculous pricing level as Sandy Bridge-E. I loved the Athlon, Athlon XP and Athlon 64 back then, I hope AMD can some day put that much pressure on Intel again.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kiyoshi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:27:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35069</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35030</link>
			<description><![CDATA[that was debunked. both AMD and intel have been using automatic tools for many many years, including with the athlon64 also, as a fan of AMD, i have to say you got a lot of facts wrong. bulldozer is a true octo core. it has 2 int execution units per modules so its 2 cores. shared logic don't suddenly make it a single core. the core1 and 2 weren't single cores because they shared the l2 were they? and the floating point unit can service both cores at the same time, except with the still hardly ever used AVX instructions.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:37:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35030</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>majorpayne says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35023</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Lets wait for Piledriver maybe it will be like Phenom I to Phenom II. But for me the best processor of AMD right now is the Phenom II X6 1100T. :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>majorpayne</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:34:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35023</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jay says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35018</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Look man I apologize I love AMD as much as you do & just want to see them do well. With this BD mess I just can't help but feel frustrated towards them...its still time they die-shrink the Phenom architechture make it have better power-consumption even if it gives equal performance I'll buy it still.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:57:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35018</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gasssosa says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35014</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm an AMD fun as well...not a fanboy, but have to admit that BD is not a competitive product for only one factor, Energy consumption. If this processor was consuming about 65W I would have bought one straight away regardless of lesser performance to I seriers from Intel. Unfortunately I do not own a refrigerated cabinet and the cabinet under my desk gets pretty hot as it stands now.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>gasssosa</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:02:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35014</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hoohoo says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35007</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Jay, @SuperXP, @zeropercenthot gas... BD design was targeted at data centers first and the desktop second. I suggest to you all that debating about BD CPUs on the desktop is to miss the point. For common server workloads - which means lots of integer math and boolean logic - it does very well. The FPU I think is yet to be proven bad or good: it is known that FP code must be recompiled for BD. Recompiling code for new CPUs, not to mention new architectures, is not a big deal but it takes time to get the code into the market: I do not think we have seen much FP software outside HPC made available that has been tweaked for BD.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>hoohoo</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 06:23:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35007</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35004</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Will all due respect, I am absolutely no TROLL in any forum. I am mealy stating the facts. On paper Bulldozer was suppose to be approx: 20% faster clock for clock vs. its current Phenom II CPU, not Intel’s line of CPU’s. Within Bulldozer’s design phase AMD made the mistake of removing precision hand crafting by actual people, design techniques and instead relied heavily on automation. Remember the good old Athlon and Athlon 64 days? A lot of that was human hand crafting the design. Anyhow, the past is the past. Bulldozer is what it is today, and hopefully for the sake of competition they fix it so that Piledriver performs the way it was meant to. That said, so long as AMD keeps the prices competitively in terms of Price/Performance, they will have no problem selling them fast.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 02:42:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35004</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jay says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35002</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ur the same guy who trolls around different forums saying how Bulldozer is nice & blah blah? Really does AMD pay you or what? Really I also love AMD but I can see the light when they messed up so bad with BD...you guys & that other Intel idiot faildozer guy are totally pathetic. You should go flame this guy after reading this - http://scalibq.wordpress.com/2011/08/11/yes-amd-fanboys-are-idiots/ friggin' AMD trolls.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 02:21:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25068-amd-ceo-believes-in-first-to-market#comment-35002</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
