<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nvidia's GTX 560 Ti 448 gets reviewed</title>
		<description>Discuss Nvidia's GTX 560 Ti 448 gets reviewed</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25043-nvidias-gtx-560-ti-448-gets-reviewed</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:59:31 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/25043/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>faildozzer  says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25043-nvidias-gtx-560-ti-448-gets-reviewed#comment-34898</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They should have launched this card earlier and for less price..Its lil bit to late,as many will be waiting new gen cards from Nv and amd. And as usual,new card gets overpriced,when price settles down,it will be very good card for good price,and its funny to see how this card raping more expensive amd cards.After price drop,it will rape even more :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>faildozzer </dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:52:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/25043-nvidias-gtx-560-ti-448-gets-reviewed#comment-34898</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
