<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel Ivy Bridge scheduled for April</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel Ivy Bridge scheduled for April</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24998-intel-ivy-bridge-scheduled-for-april</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 22:34:04 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24998/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Jay says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24998-intel-ivy-bridge-scheduled-for-april#comment-34737</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Don't totally agree with you...for general performance their low/mainstream segment(pentium ,i3) is priced almost same as amd's offerings. Gone are the times when AMD offerred you more performance/efficiency at same price compared to Intel. It's basically the other way around if your doing general computing i.e browsing, music, games, movies, downloading.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 21:16:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24998-intel-ivy-bridge-scheduled-for-april#comment-34737</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Darren says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24998-intel-ivy-bridge-scheduled-for-april#comment-34706</link>
			<description><![CDATA[well intel is great engineering packed in a small package, for a huge hit to the bank. but performs damn well]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:57:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24998-intel-ivy-bridge-scheduled-for-april#comment-34706</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24998-intel-ivy-bridge-scheduled-for-april#comment-34699</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So this means Geforce 600 series will be on April too? Coz they said it will go in time with Ivy Bridge.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 18:19:55 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24998-intel-ivy-bridge-scheduled-for-april#comment-34699</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jay says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24998-intel-ivy-bridge-scheduled-for-april#comment-34696</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You are wrong, please post facts. As per anandtech Intel have mentioned 20% CPU performance increase for IB compared to SB 60% is for the GPU Performance of IB to SB. Please correct your story.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 17:56:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24998-intel-ivy-bridge-scheduled-for-april#comment-34696</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>milkod2001 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24998-intel-ivy-bridge-scheduled-for-april#comment-34692</link>
			<description><![CDATA[quote:as well as up to 60 percent better performance when compared to the current Sandy Bridge architeture 20% at the best I'd say, still enough for me,coming from ancient Q6600... I only hope Intel don't get too greedy cos AMD has nothing to compete with unfortunately]]></description>
			<dc:creator>milkod2001</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:50:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24998-intel-ivy-bridge-scheduled-for-april#comment-34692</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
