<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel rolls out Sandy Bridge based Pentium 350 </title>
		<description>Discuss Intel rolls out Sandy Bridge based Pentium 350 </description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:51:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24951/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Medallish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34625</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Since I'm guessing a certain person won't get my point I'll try and say it as simple as possible. If you want to make a low power, and small cased HTPC, solutions like E350/E450 on a Mini-itx board, is probably the best solution out there, and when I mean small case, I mean really small, with no room for expansion cards(or video cards), once you go beyond that size and you have room for expansions, there's pretty much no reason at all to use a 15W CPU only, especially not one that's likely to come at a premium price, and even though it's faster than the E450, It's still slow at the tasks you link to, and HTPC is about Media, not CPU speed. You can edit away your mistakes, but I still got the mail with the reply, you can't get Pentium 350 with IGP, therefore, it's pointless.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Medallish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:30:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34625</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Medallish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34623</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dear Moroon1 As I said in my previous post, which was the reason for the insults to begin with, I didn't mention CPU speed, rather questioned the useability of a low speed low power CPU in a HTPC, where you'll need an embedded video card, this simply makes no sense, if you're going to make a low power HTPC, using an embedded card you might as well get a 35W I3, however if you want low-power yes the E450, is the better choice, not only because of the IGP, that makes it much more suitable for small cases, but also considering price. now I was mistaken on the whole K8/K10 issue, and that's my bad, you're still a moron for turning this into a discussion about CPU speed when that was never the issue I had with it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Medallish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:54:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34623</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>maroon1 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34601</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dear Medallish, I'm using my head more than you do Brazos is slower clock for clock than even K8 based CPU (let alone K10) Please look at this CPU benchmarks http://www.anandtech.com/show/4023/the-brazos-performance-preview-amd-e350-benchmarked/3 The benchmarks shows that i3 330UM 1.2GHz(It is a low voltage CPU) is day and night faster than E350. In some cases it is almost twice as fast. Pentium 350 has similar specification as i3 330UM (1.2GHz and HT). However Pentium 350 is based on superior sandy bridge architecture. So, it is even faster than i3 330UM. I showed you a proof that you wrong (look at anandtech review). Can you now apologize for insulting me?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>maroon1</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:02:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34601</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Medallish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34581</link>
			<description><![CDATA[lol come on use your head, ever heard of scaling? First of all you're wrong, and a moron, but more important, I didn't really say you should stick with the E450 because of speed, more because it has a capable GPU, which makes it easy to build into a small HTPC, if you need to expand with an embedded gfx, why would you even need a 15W CPU? Is SB over 37% faster than K10 clock for clock? Not in most cases, the E450 is clocked over 37% faster than the Pentium 350, CPU wise they should be similar, good luck finding a 3W GPU as good as 6320.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Medallish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:57:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34581</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>maroon1 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34580</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sandy-bridge based CPU @ 1.2GHz is still way much faster E-450 in CPU performance. You should read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megahertz_myth]]></description>
			<dc:creator>maroon1</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:45:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34580</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>maroon1 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34578</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Every modern Intel processor (except Atom) support VT-x]]></description>
			<dc:creator>maroon1</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:38:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34578</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jay says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34576</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Slowly & Steadily Intel are turning this x86 more & more power efficient. By the time ARM for Windows comes out Intel mostly likely will have a competitor to it or so it seems.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:27:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34576</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Medallish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34572</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's almost pointless as an HTPC CPU since you can't get it without a decent IGP, maybe if you pair it with Ion 2, but even then there won't be any benefits to getting this over a E450, the reason for this is, if you're going to make an HTPC with an embedded video card, you wouldn't just settle with a 15W 1.2GHz CPU.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Medallish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:08:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34572</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34558</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I wonder if we will be seeing this in netbooks? This CPU still has VT-x and HT too.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 03:05:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24951-intel-rolls-out-sandy-bridge-based-pentium-350#comment-34558</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
