<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD Trinity performance detailed</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD Trinity performance detailed</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:21:38 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24932/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Jay says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34577</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That is not the case Sir please see http://wccftech.com/amd-officially-announces-trinity-bulldozer-dx11-apus-computex-2011-release-scheduled-2012/ You can see the slides at the begining have said its on Bulldozer then its on Piledriver!? and I do not see Trinity giving load power consumption comparable to an i5...it'll surely suck up 25-35% more under load. Again, if people go the discrete graphics card route (which most mainstream-mid-end gamers do) CPU performance will be the key.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:36:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34577</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>maroon1 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34535</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Donanimhaber is not credible source. THeir slides about Bulldozer were very misleading]]></description>
			<dc:creator>maroon1</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:44:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34535</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>godrilla says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34504</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I wonder how the a15 will perform in windows 8 vs. APU. APU has the more powerful gpu but what about cpu? X86 vs. Arm ARM has way less power usage and is way cheaper. Arm vs x86( apu and ivybridge) 2012 stay tuned cant wait. Ivybridge has the most powerful cpu.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>godrilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 02:49:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34504</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nforce4max says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34494</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I guess that I will stand corrected from my past statements on the gpu part but the cpu well I am going to be going lol when Llano shows it's strength over any thing BD Trinity. What I care about the most when it comes to the apu market is the mobile versions. Got a a8 3530mx that I can game at 3ghz when overclocked without issue. They are hiding Trinity's weakness cpu side with a good gpu and expecting that no one is going to notice. Also I want to see some real benchs from multiple sources as these could be rigged. Also there is nothing about clocks or any references to exact models such as a a8 3850 or on the mobile side a a6 3400m.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nforce4max</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:52:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34494</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>redisnidma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34480</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When you see AMD boasting about "Great GPU Performance" buy stays mull about the CPU side, you know it will suck big time. 20% more than Llano?? Bulldozer should have being above this figure (CPU-wise), but it doesn't. Indeed, performance per core is worse. What this clearly says is that Pile Driver will barely catch up with Sandy Bridge. :-x]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redisnidma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:58:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34480</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Twist3d1080 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34474</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Jay Amd has stated from the very beginning that the cores in Trinity are Piledriver cores. Basically enhanced Bulldozer cores (what exactly has been enhanced? I don't know.) Also since the beginning Fusion has been targeted at notebooks. Most of the Llanos and Zacates/Ontarios sold have been in laptops and netbooks. So with that evidence I would say that its foolhardy to believe that Trinity is going to only come in 125w TDP. It would pretty much sink an already sinking AMD.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Twist3d1080</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:50:57 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34474</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>techno says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34473</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Tivibu tivibu..la la..la la la..tivibu tivibu ..la la..la la la..tivibu tivibu..la la ..la la la..piledriver core +20% on llano core..la la..la la la...failure failure..la la..la la la..failure failure..la la..la la la]]></description>
			<dc:creator>techno</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:46:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34473</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Twist3d1080 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34472</link>
			<description><![CDATA[How can you Crossfire a VLIW-4 GPU on Trinity and a VLIW-5 GPU on Turks? I'm pretty sure that its impossible. Maybe the writer forgot that the new line up GPUs are coming out. He also must have forgotten that the Trinity is going to Crossfire with the new HD 7000 series not HD 6000 series, which the lower end will be based on VLIW-4 and Upper end on GCN architecture. If he didn't about these things them maybe he probably shouldn't be writing for a site where its readers are more informed than its staff.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Twist3d1080</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:40:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34472</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34471</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think the BD is poor in CPU performance compared to previous architecture. I dont know maybe the OS was not optimized for that architecture yet, let's see when Windows 8 comes.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:37:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34471</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jay says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34470</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wonder what's the CPU performance like? half the slides floating are misleading...couple say it's based on Bulldozer core others say it's on Piledriver. GPU performance is impressive...but I guess it'll be a power hungry beast as usual w/ 125w TDP]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:30:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24932-amd-trinity-performance-detailed#comment-34470</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
