<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Most people are yet to pay for an App</title>
		<description>Discuss Most people are yet to pay for an App</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24860-most-people-are-yet-to-pay-for-an-app</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:35:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24860/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>NidStyles says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24860-most-people-are-yet-to-pay-for-an-app#comment-34279</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Because most App's are just rehashed functionality that should already be there in the OS. If it's an App, why pay when you can have the free version and never have to pay for it?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>NidStyles</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:24:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24860-most-people-are-yet-to-pay-for-an-app#comment-34279</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PorscheRacer14 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24860-most-people-are-yet-to-pay-for-an-app#comment-34237</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yep, very true. In fact, the current trend is to release a full, or at least 90% version of your app with ads, and then have a paid version without ads but with the full feature list. This way you can collect the revenue stream over time, but yet also get paid immediately.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>PorscheRacer14</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:10:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24860-most-people-are-yet-to-pay-for-an-app#comment-34237</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Icec0o1 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24860-most-people-are-yet-to-pay-for-an-app#comment-34220</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Because free apps have ads.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Icec0o1</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:12:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24860-most-people-are-yet-to-pay-for-an-app#comment-34220</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thematrix606 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24860-most-people-are-yet-to-pay-for-an-app#comment-34210</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Aside from games, a lot of useless apps, that people do not need on their mobile device, but would rather do behind a desk, where you have a nice big screen, comfortable chair, and a (hopefully) quiet environment. Plus, when it's an app that has 1/100th the features of what a Windows app would have, why would you even WANT to pay a lot of money for it? Hmmm.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thematrix606</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:55:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24860-most-people-are-yet-to-pay-for-an-app#comment-34210</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
