<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel's Sandy Bridge E hits review benches</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel's Sandy Bridge E hits review benches</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:38:58 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24839/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>navair2 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34304</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Not much to see here, move along...;) Benchmarks are only slightly better than i7-980X / 990X and i7-2600K. Not enough to warrant even $500, much less a grand IMO.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>navair2</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 04:36:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34304</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fud_u says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34253</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Kidney for sale. Anyone interested?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fud_u</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:22:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34253</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34219</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So Quad-Channel just sounds good and looks good on paper. In the Server/Workstation arena, you will benefit. They need to take a page out and start developing app's and programs to fully utilize the Quad-Channel but in an intelligent way. Will this happen, lol probably not.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:01:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34219</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34205</link>
			<description><![CDATA[it does have it. for the server market where it makes sense. AMD has had that for years already. for the desktop its useless. and besides with dual channel ddr3 1866 it has slightly more bandwidth then intel's previous high-end platform s1366. and that platform didn't need it either.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:02:30 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34205</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>robert3892 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34202</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The i7 3820 is coming and it will be cheaper but at the expense of limited overclocking. Probably 1st quarter of 2012]]></description>
			<dc:creator>robert3892</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:07:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34202</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>deadspeedv says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34199</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No real point in buying Enthusiast stuff anymore since all games are console ports. Even entry to mid range gear can easily handle most games at full settings. And no new consoles til like 2015 (besides new Wii). Gone are the days of games like Crysis that really pushed computers to their limits. So much power computers have but nothing that will even use half of it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>deadspeedv</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:49:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34199</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34192</link>
			<description><![CDATA["Huge" is a gross overstatement. It's mostly 50% better than any AMD, keyword mostly. Against 1155, it's not spectacular. Since we're not talking about gaming, I could probably build several machines for the same amount of money and get the job done faster, better, and more reliable in a virtualized sphere. There's nothing that would make sense to buy this unless it's to break OC'ing records.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:50:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34192</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>maroon1 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34183</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There is huge improvement over i7 2600 in multi-threaded applications Not everyone use PC to play games only.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>maroon1</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:10:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34183</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nt300 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34181</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Or maybe AMD's Piledriver can offer better value and performance. Either way this SandyBridge-E is a waist of money IMO.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nt300</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:48:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34181</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>stun says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34179</link>
			<description><![CDATA[LGA 2011 is a DOA (dead on arrival) platform with Ivy Bridge just around the corner. I will save my money and wait for Ivy Bridge for better performance + energy efficiency.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>stun</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:09:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24839-intels-sandy-bridge-e-hits-review-benches#comment-34179</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
