<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Corsair rolls out Performance Pro SSDs</title>
		<description>Discuss Corsair rolls out Performance Pro SSDs</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24823-corsair-rolls-out-performance-pro-ssds</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 08:58:11 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24823/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Fidovoff says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24823-corsair-rolls-out-performance-pro-ssds#comment-34156</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You also got the Samsung SSD 830 series that are very reliable]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Fidovoff</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:09:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24823-corsair-rolls-out-performance-pro-ssds#comment-34156</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Captain828 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24823-corsair-rolls-out-performance-pro-ssds#comment-34136</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's not the controller which lowers the price, it's the type of memory and synchronous memory is more expensive than the asynch one (which is used in most cheap SSDs). Also, synch memory has a better lifespan (less wear) than asynch.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Captain828</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:26:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24823-corsair-rolls-out-performance-pro-ssds#comment-34136</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>godrilla says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24823-corsair-rolls-out-performance-pro-ssds#comment-34124</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I couldn't have said it better, I had the c300 ssd @ 256 for almost 2 years now with the latest firmware 009 and love the reliability and perfomance. The crucial support is very good too. Check out newegg reviews search for ssds with the best reviews you see m4 on top of the list with 85 average of 5 eggs for all/most of their ssds Ocz 50% get 5 stars Corsair don't even go there Check out my youtube video of loading crysis warhead under 30 seconds which usually takes 1 min or more with hd https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iy-pQEQuK0&feature=youtube_gdata_player]]></description>
			<dc:creator>godrilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:13:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24823-corsair-rolls-out-performance-pro-ssds#comment-34124</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Carbonfibre says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24823-corsair-rolls-out-performance-pro-ssds#comment-34114</link>
			<description><![CDATA[But it's not about performance it's about reliability! I'll be getting my first SSD soon and I've been informed to avoid all Sandforce-based SSD's like the plague. The only choice seems to be the Crucial M4 still.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Carbonfibre</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:45:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24823-corsair-rolls-out-performance-pro-ssds#comment-34114</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
