<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>HTC working on first quad-core phone</title>
		<description>Discuss HTC working on first quad-core phone</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:55:14 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24756/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Stormkroe says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33881</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I think the 'more cores=terrible battery' people should get a room with the '3D is a gimmick' people and talk about the good ol' days back when phones didn't have even one definable 'core' and a 2nd dimension that was only 2 LCD cells high. Remember that 5th core in the tegras? Yeah, the low power one that handles 75%+ of the phones process roster? Quit regurgitating disproved B.S.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Stormkroe</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:44:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33881</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dribble says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33862</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Forget the cpu - it's got a 720p screen, wow!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dribble</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:10:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33862</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ramcoza says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33857</link>
			<description><![CDATA[May I take this argue as "The fact that Intel doesn't need octa to compete against that joke is a long time known fact"? Will u agree? ;)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>ramcoza</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:41:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33857</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eddman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33855</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Oh I understood that perfectly and let me clarify even more. That ex-AMD division is responsible for adreno. They had nothing to do with designing krait, which is the CPU part in snapdragon S4 SoC. You continue posting anti-nvidia comments, to achieve what exactly?! More competition is always good. TI and Qualcomm make great chips and with nvidia in the game we shall see better products from all of them and in shorter time frames. All in all it'd result in faster advancements in mobile computing. Haters like you who mix stupid fanboyism with technology matters have no place here.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>eddman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:28:32 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33855</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33853</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Calm down whiny, it´s obvious u can't understand more than 3 words in a paragraph, thats why i typed "ex-amd", MORON. The fact that QCom and TI doesn't need quad to compete against that joke is a long time known fact. I can´t be arguing with a poor devil like you so take a life.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:53:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33853</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eddman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33849</link>
			<description><![CDATA[4. As I've already wrote in another post, quad-core kraits will be available no sooner than Q4 2012. 5. and TI doesn't have any quads in their roadmap as of now. P.S. Qualcomm, not Qualcom. Desperate, not desesperate.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>eddman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:11:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33849</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eddman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33848</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The amount of BS in your post is just off the charts. I hope it's not contagious. 1. Qualcomm is NOT a former AMD division. They BOUGHT AMD's former mobile division, which was formerly ATI's. Qualcomm was founded in 1985. 2. It was the graphics and multimedia division that they bought, not mobile CPU, as they were already making mobile CPUs long before that acquisition. 3. nvidia, that you are calling a "desesperate taiwanese company", is actually an AMERICAN company, based in Santa Clara, California....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>eddman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:10:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33848</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33842</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Krait S processor from Qualcom (ex AMD mobile division) will teach some lessons to this wanna be chip from a desesperate taiwanese company. Later on, OMAP new release will wipe the floor from green leftovers...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:14:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33842</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33837</link>
			<description><![CDATA[40nm? wouldn't 32nm/28nm be the way to go? Especially with the battery life of a quad core :S]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:29:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33837</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>STRESS says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33836</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And the battery will probably last half a day on load and it will burn your hand if your not careful. 40nm quad core Tegra is completely ridiculous]]></description>
			<dc:creator>STRESS</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:28:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24756-htc-working-on-first-quad-core-phone#comment-33836</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
