<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Gearbox says Duke didn’t get a fair shake</title>
		<description>Discuss Gearbox says Duke didn’t get a fair shake</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:53:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24738/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>thetruth says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33871</link>
			<description><![CDATA[1) I wasn't paid, and I agree with them. 2) Come on... that's just a silly claim, and doesn't explain why Duke Nukem was hated more than most games.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thetruth</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:38:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33871</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>clutch22 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33823</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I didn't think it got a fair shake at all. I recently purchased it thinking it was going to be a pile of crap (because of the "reviews") and it turned out to be one of the funnest games I've played in awhile. There's 2 things I think are going on. 1) There's outside influence in game reviews...we know that from the Gamespot fiasco. They are getting paid to write favorable reviews for certain big name publishers. Whose to say these same companies aren't paying them to write unfavorable reviews of their competitions games? 2) Reviewers are becoming lazy. Some of them only play the first level or two and then skim through youtube videos in order to finish the review. Really?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>clutch22</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 05:48:58 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33823</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>thetruth says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33798</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There are some games, like Serious Sam and Doom, that I can pick up and enjoy today. There are others, like DNF, which feel rushed, poorly balanced, frustrating and amateurish. I agree with the reviews. DNF feels confused. It should have had more ammo, more enemies and more weapons. As far as I'm concerned it tried to get the worst of both worlds, and succeeded in doing so.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>thetruth</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:54:10 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33798</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33795</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Duke sucks. i could pirate it, but its not even worth it.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:39:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33795</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DaRAGE says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33793</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes it was, Especially driving that big 4 wheeled monster truck with its massive turbo. talk about air time ;-P]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DaRAGE</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:54:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33793</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JAB Creations says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33781</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just made it easy to tell which writers were full of crap. I think there's some political agendas laden in there too since the controlled media usually acts in cohesion but if you're reading your news here online instead then you're likely already smart enough to know that. The game was fun and that's what a game is supposed to be, even if some of the things Duke says or does are debatable in one fashion or another.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JAB Creations</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:53:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33781</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DaRAGE says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33779</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have to agree with this reporter in that the duke was old style shooter and reviewers were not expecting it. I also agree. Duke didn't get a fair review and was judged much too harshly say by receiving at least 20-30-40% less points out of 100% than it would be if it was any other game. i been playing games and reading reviews since i was about 8. 20 years later im still doing the same. I even went so far as to buy 3 review mags as i was shocked by the harsh and unfounded comments of my usual mag. the critics were way too harsh in most reviews compared to the actual product. I'd have given it a score of 65 - 75]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DaRAGE</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:22:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24738-gearbox-says-duke-didn’t-get-a-fair-shake#comment-33779</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
