<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>ARM releases 64 bit server chips</title>
		<description>Discuss ARM releases 64 bit server chips</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24632-arm-releases-64-bit-server-chips</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:06:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24632/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>roberto.tomas says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24632-arm-releases-64-bit-server-chips#comment-33577</link>
			<description><![CDATA[releases might be a tad strong :) -- they still haven't released arm cortex a15s. :D alright, so there are prototype proof of concepts and tape outs but, still..]]></description>
			<dc:creator>roberto.tomas</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:18:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24632-arm-releases-64-bit-server-chips#comment-33577</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JWellington says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24632-arm-releases-64-bit-server-chips#comment-33409</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Finally!! About time. This was really holding ARM back. I would have liked to see them drop support for 32-bit; perhaps in the future they will. Being a skinny RISC-architecture, it would do better without supporting legacy crap, which is what plagues x86.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JWellington</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:35:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24632-arm-releases-64-bit-server-chips#comment-33409</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
