<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD gears up to take on ultrabooks</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD gears up to take on ultrabooks</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:29:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24578/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33263</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Adoption is a matter of getting first out... not who started it. If ARM or some other processor design company would have been it then, a lot of their tech would have evolved to be as powerful as x86, if not better.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:43:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33263</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Medallish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33234</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Where did anyone say Intel never innovated? Fact is we need both companies to get the result we have today, Intel fans should be on their knees thanking AMD for pushing Intel in the direction of the Core architecture, and AMD fans should be overjoyed that Intel started an architecture AMD would adopt and do extremely well.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Medallish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:57:55 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33234</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33229</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No that is not the point. If AMD didn't do it 1st, Intel would never have moved away from it's crapy Pentium 4 design. And today we would probably have Pentium 6 & 7's with high power draw and crapy performance.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:17:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33229</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33228</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It doesn't matter if AMD does not catch up to Intel in terms of Speed, what they need to do is compete in Price/Performance/Watt. AMD doesn't have enough money to compete with Massive Billion $ Intel. What AMD needs to do is ensure they can beat out the Phenom II X6 1100T by as much as 25% to 50%. AMD needs to compete with its older GEN CPU's not Intel's. Until AMD can match Intel in R&D and Manufacturing power, AMD will always remain behind for at least another 2 to 4 years. Future CPU Design called code name Excavator may be the CPU that could very well bring AMD back in winning the performance crown. Only Time Will Tell.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:14:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33228</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JEskandari says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33225</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well it's useless for AMD to compete with a server chip with desktop chip even if by b3 stepping AMD Manage to squeeze another 15% of it all Intel need to do is just release Core I7 2800k and 2900k sadly there is a problem in bulldozer design that like any other server chip made it a little power hungry when you increase the frequency something that chips like sandy-bridge or phenom didn't suffered from .]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JEskandari</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:45:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33225</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Super XP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33223</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I believe nt300's point was AMD being a massive Underdog led the way while Intel followed all these years. Intel has massive R&D and yet AMD Bulldozed through them with pure innovation. I've said this before and I will say it again, AMD's aggressive innovation is what released the Monster inside Intel. Now I don't know if AMD can ever catch up, but Bulldozer being based on a Server CPU didn't help the company at all. Dam management.....We only hope the revised B3 stepping along with tweaks and the like will be enough to help Bulldozser perform the way it was meant to perform, and that is Bulldoze the Competition.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Super XP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:24:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33223</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The blue fox says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33221</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I could do the same thing with intel. First's x86,Hyper-threading, 64-bit random access memory, invention of the microprocessor, Underclocking (AKA speedstep), 3d transistor. First 8 16 32-bit processors, first CPU to have a cache. i can go on. IT don't matter who is first, It matters who's doing it better. and that Intel right now.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The blue fox</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:54:11 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33221</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33218</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I don't know if AMD will ever be as strong and innovative as they were, Meyer made sure of that, we can only hope for the better.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:51:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33218</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33217</link>
			<description><![CDATA[^ They have one CPU design team, and even so, engineers follow certain exec people If they leave so will the engineers. For all the praise Meyer got he pretty much took a dump on them, this is how things were going at AMD, this is why he "left", and not because he was such a good CEO. If AMD had better management that cared about their employee it wouldn't be in this situation with BD. But here we are, with a server CPU. With one team, all they could do was a server chip that kinda works for the desktop, since the server clients pay way more for a single unit than what you or I would give for a desktop part. They took the financial sound solution... even if it means taking heat on the desktop front.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:49:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33217</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>nt300 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33212</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Read this Very Well Written Article from 2004. This my friends is Pure FACT as we sit here today in 2011-2012. Dam Good Read.... This is why everybody should BUY the Bulldozer/Piledriver Platform to support AMD, though we should buy it, but at the same time e-mail/phone AMD with your critisism as to why they released a Server/Workstation CPU as a Desktop?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>nt300</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:51:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24578-amd-gears-up-to-take-on-ultrabooks#comment-33212</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
