<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD launches FX Series Bulldozer CPUs</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD launches FX Series Bulldozer CPUs</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24430-amd-launches-its-fx-series-bulldozer-cpus</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:42:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24430/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Boomstick777 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24430-amd-launches-its-fx-series-bulldozer-cpus#comment-32763</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Actually kered10 is right, it is way to expensive for its performance! In most cases the previous 1090T and 1100T beat it!! It also runs extremely hot becausce of the huge amount of power it uses! The power consumption is off the charts!!!!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Boomstick777</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:43:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24430-amd-launches-its-fx-series-bulldozer-cpus#comment-32763</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JEskandari says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24430-amd-launches-its-fx-series-bulldozer-cpus#comment-32708</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I wonder if that FX4100 is capable of competing with the Core I3 2310m in my notebook ? By the way that 2310m clocked at 2.13mhz and has no turbo capabilities but on the plus side have HD3000 embedded in it and the TDP is only 35w. this bulldozer was a great let down]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JEskandari</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:45:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24430-amd-launches-its-fx-series-bulldozer-cpus#comment-32708</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>a1927 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24430-amd-launches-its-fx-series-bulldozer-cpus#comment-32643</link>
			<description><![CDATA[When I will be building my next supercomputer with 5000 CPUs I sure to call AMD. Until that time - bye bye, thank you very much. I wish AMD luck at server market but this was total disappointment indeed!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>a1927</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:39:23 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24430-amd-launches-its-fx-series-bulldozer-cpus#comment-32643</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>techman95 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24430-amd-launches-its-fx-series-bulldozer-cpus#comment-32638</link>
			<description><![CDATA[your first two statements are false. they are not hot AMD chips are almost never and expensive? the top one is cheaper than a 2600k, but they are disappointing in the speed department.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>techman95</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:38:41 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24430-amd-launches-its-fx-series-bulldozer-cpus#comment-32638</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>kered10 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24430-amd-launches-its-fx-series-bulldozer-cpus#comment-32633</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Expensive, hot and slow. I am moving to Intel, I really hoped for more.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>kered10</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:02:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24430-amd-launches-its-fx-series-bulldozer-cpus#comment-32633</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
