<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Texas Instruments comments Windows 8 support</title>
		<description>Discuss Texas Instruments comments Windows 8 support</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24388-texas-instruments-comments-windows-8-support</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:50:13 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24388/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>qwe says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24388-texas-instruments-comments-windows-8-support#comment-32410</link>
			<description><![CDATA[pogsnet Low power and high performance requires different chip design. You can't have both at the same time. LP core in T30 is quite different from the rest.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>qwe</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:55:05 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24388-texas-instruments-comments-windows-8-support#comment-32410</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24388-texas-instruments-comments-windows-8-support#comment-32396</link>
			<description><![CDATA["offloading processing tasks to slower cores to maximize device’s efficiency, not seen in the x86 world" Hmmm... x86 have different approach instead it overclocks itself when heavy tasks is loaded, or power gate other cores if not need or underclocks itself. So there is no need for slower cores since all cores are flexible.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:05:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24388-texas-instruments-comments-windows-8-support#comment-32396</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
