<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD shares dip 13 percent on revised forecast</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD shares dip 13 percent on revised forecast</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:46:18 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24284/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32038</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well, intel "Extreme" has already become Barcelona :), nobody is perfect: http://www.techpowerup.com/152978/Sandy-Bridge-E-VT-d-Broken-In-C1-Stepping-Fixed-In-C2-Stepping-Shortly-After-Launch.html]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 10:33:17 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32038</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32036</link>
			<description><![CDATA[U are a [censored]ing hypocrite, bashing all day long on amd, and all of a sudden recomending ip ban. Hilarious.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 10:30:49 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32036</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Medallish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32033</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Nice, and about time, there must have been quite many Warrior accounts that needed to be shut down? I like discussing with people, but the kind of discussion you have with Warrior and alike is simply pointless, and all you get is trolled. Good job on the cleaning up!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Medallish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 00:09:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32033</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32021</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I wanted to write in a previous comment exactly that about what execs think. Well, it won't! BD is a good architecture and we can expect good CPUs out of it. I think most people wanted AMD to clearly beat Intel, well those times are over, Intel's on the lookout on all fronts and whenever they sense trouble they open up the vault and spend some to overcome that problem. Money...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 19:28:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32021</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>123s says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32012</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Why do I think that its gonna turn out like Phenom and Phenom II :(]]></description>
			<dc:creator>123s</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:12:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32012</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dave_Tangeir says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32011</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That would be a simple shipment to Cray as far as we know. Remember, earlier in the year AMD told us that the 32 nm yield problems were behind them, and this turned out to not be true. Between AMD and tabloid rumor mill digitimes, I am more inclined to believe the tabloid rumor mill rag.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dave_Tangeir</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:37:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32011</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dave_Tangeir says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32010</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Don't assume it's growing, AMD dropped 13% because the revenue will come in less than expected. Though 4-6% higher, that is 4 to 6% higher than the prior quarter. Typically Q3 is 10-15% higher for either AMD or Intel. This is not a 'growth' question, it is a question of expectation against typical norms. They fell short, way short.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Dave_Tangeir</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:35:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32010</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JBG says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32009</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bulldozer actually began shipping in September: http://www.amd.com/us/press-releases/Pages/amd-ships-bulldozer-processors-2011sep7.aspx]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JBG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 03:56:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32009</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>muddocktor says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32008</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much for doing this, nele. It will be much more enjoyable reading the site and comments without the tards meesing the site up man! :lol:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>muddocktor</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 02:04:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32008</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eddman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32007</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes, they are level from a business point of view, but at least in the high demand scenario you can be glad that people actually want your stuff. :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>eddman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 00:15:23 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24284-amd-shares-dip-13-percent-after-revised-forecast#comment-32007</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
