<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Samsung to open source Bada</title>
		<description>Discuss Samsung to open source Bada</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24158-samsung-to-open-source-bada</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:20:28 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24158/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Warrior24_7 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24158-samsung-to-open-source-bada#comment-31241</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hmmmm... Let's see here. They're being sued by Apple for IP theft, they're trying to distance themselves from Google because they purchased their rival Motorola, but they're trying to counter sue Apple using Motorola's patents! This company is starting to sould like the DOO DOO machine! :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Warrior24_7</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:56:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24158-samsung-to-open-source-bada#comment-31241</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Peter Ong says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24158-samsung-to-open-source-bada#comment-31239</link>
			<description><![CDATA[There're few types of open source license. Some like Linux releases full src codes & enable modification, some only only let you use for free. Samsung's not doing charity, its intention is clearly commercial.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Peter Ong</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:54:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24158-samsung-to-open-source-bada#comment-31239</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Exodite says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24158-samsung-to-open-source-bada#comment-31218</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Did Samsung explicitly declare that this was due to wanting to distance themselves from Android is that just another round of FUD? The original article is subscription-based so it's hard to tell.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Exodite</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:23:54 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24158-samsung-to-open-source-bada#comment-31218</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
