<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel SSDs to get SandForce</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel SSDs to get SandForce</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24102-intel-ssds-to-get-sandforce</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:02:32 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/24102/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>youserzero says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24102-intel-ssds-to-get-sandforce#comment-30973</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That's disappointing to hear. I was really looking forward to getting one for my boot drive but I guess I'll still be waiting for them to mature a bit more!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>youserzero</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:40:20 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24102-intel-ssds-to-get-sandforce#comment-30973</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24102-intel-ssds-to-get-sandforce#comment-30971</link>
			<description><![CDATA[so intel buys sandforce and all other brands therefore become more expensive due to licensing costs... intel monopolizes once again. next thing you know...intel will make power supplies and memory and...comp cases, why not. amd is making memory, why not intel...we shall see.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:52:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24102-intel-ssds-to-get-sandforce#comment-30971</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Exodite says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24102-intel-ssds-to-get-sandforce#comment-30969</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The source of the undisclosed controller chip of the upcoming 520-series from Intel perhaps? If so I think I know what SSD lives in my future, unless Samsung's 830 ends up absolutely fantastic.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Exodite</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:52:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24102-intel-ssds-to-get-sandforce#comment-30969</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>mcekovic says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24102-intel-ssds-to-get-sandforce#comment-30965</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Intel is not OCZ, what is expensive to OCS might not be expensive to much bigger Intel.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>mcekovic</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:37:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24102-intel-ssds-to-get-sandforce#comment-30965</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>milkod2001 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24102-intel-ssds-to-get-sandforce#comment-30929</link>
			<description><![CDATA[SSD drives based on SandForce controllers are the fastest but the least reliable(many problems with booting, loosing all data, not able to work after it gets to sleep mode ect). If Intel really start using SF that could only help to solve problems.Good news here.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>milkod2001</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:44:51 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/24102-intel-ssds-to-get-sandforce#comment-30929</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
