<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Bulldozer for servers in production</title>
		<description>Discuss Bulldozer for servers in production</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:59:34 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23994/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>dew111 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30569</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD originally planned to introduce the Bulldozer architecture three years ago, not necessarily with 16 cores.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dew111</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:57:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30569</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>recalc_task_prio says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30498</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I use virtual machines to run copies of XP to test IE6/IE7 and a virtual machine to run Windows 7 to test IE9/10. I can allocate 1-4 cores per virtual machine. I'm also at the point where 4GB is limiting and I don't run a page file (as it reduces performance, if you run out of RAM in my case you KNOW it instead of your system running slower). I was referring to physical rackable servers not desktop or workstation usage. The post is "Bulldozers for servers". My point is that non-VM designs often have a server for each network service, which is wasteful.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>recalc_task_prio</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:49:28 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30498</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>recalc_task_prio says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30497</link>
			<description><![CDATA[My point is that architects of large data centres usually install a single network service on a single physcial server and this is under utilization of the CPU. Last week I installed two HP DL 360 (Xeon E5650 6C/2T) with a single network service each. Have you never seen a single instance of HTTP server running on a single machine? Or MySQL running on a single machine? Or individual infrastructure network services installed on single machines? Under RHEL I've run top on see 24 logical cores, with 20 just doing nothing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>recalc_task_prio</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:44:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30497</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>recalc_task_prio says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30495</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No, I'm not retarded. You are.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>recalc_task_prio</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:37:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30495</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>recalc_task_prio says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30494</link>
			<description><![CDATA[A hypervisor is not a network service. Commercial and government data centres do have physcial rack servers running a single network service. Not all sites run VMware. My point is that a dual socket server with 32 cores will rarely be CPU bound under current non-hypervisor configuration.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>recalc_task_prio</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:36:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30494</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The blue fox says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30451</link>
			<description><![CDATA[No but they had an 80 core. Tho is simply to costly to make. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAKG0UvtzpE]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The blue fox</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:04:04 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30451</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JAB Creations says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30436</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I use virtual machines to run copies of XP to test IE6/IE7 and a virtual machine to run Windows 7 to test IE9/10. I can allocate 1-4 cores per virtual machine. I'm also at the point where 4GB is limiting and I don't run a page file (as it reduces performance, if you run out of RAM in my case you KNOW it instead of your system running slower). There are people who CAN utilize more cores or more RAM albeit not as many as may be advertised by some. Tablets in are mainly a waste though there are some graphic designers who actually find them useful in example.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JAB Creations</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:37:12 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30436</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Regenweald says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30430</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Are you [censored]ing retarded ? seriously ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Regenweald</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:13:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30430</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cartman says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30413</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD is nearly three years late with this product hahahah so you wanna say Intel had 16-core CPU three years ago...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cartman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:21:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30413</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>evolucion8 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30406</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Blah blah blah, shut up, Your same old repetitive gay related chit chat is boring.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>evolucion8</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:44:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23994-bulldozer-for-servers-in-production#comment-30406</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
