<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Nvidia doesn’t believe in ultrabooks</title>
		<description>Discuss Nvidia doesn’t believe in ultrabooks</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23990-nvidia-doesn’t-believe-in-ultrabooks</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:34:18 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23990/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>dicobalt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23990-nvidia-doesn’t-believe-in-ultrabooks#comment-30692</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Considering the cost of high end ARM solutions Nvidia laptop/desktop ARM systems are going to be extremely expensive also.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dicobalt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:54:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23990-nvidia-doesn’t-believe-in-ultrabooks#comment-30692</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>markhahn says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23990-nvidia-doesn’t-believe-in-ultrabooks#comment-30442</link>
			<description><![CDATA[a company that sells mostly add-in cards and some tablet chips doesn't think much of a market segment in which they don't participate? shock! the interesting thing is that NV doesn't seem to be trying very hard to search for new markets. AMD and Intel will eliminate the AIC/GPU market pretty soon. is Tesla/Cuda a sure thing, enough to float the whole company?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>markhahn</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:47:31 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23990-nvidia-doesn’t-believe-in-ultrabooks#comment-30442</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>chyll2 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23990-nvidia-doesn’t-believe-in-ultrabooks#comment-30440</link>
			<description><![CDATA[While I personally dont believe in ultrabooks, I think nvidia would have different opinion if those Intel ultrabooks utilized their GPU products even if it cost additional $$.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>chyll2</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:18:45 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23990-nvidia-doesn’t-believe-in-ultrabooks#comment-30440</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JAB Creations says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23990-nvidia-doesn’t-believe-in-ultrabooks#comment-30438</link>
			<description><![CDATA[This was actually a decently written article, why would I want to plop down a grand for an Intel slim-laptop that has a 90 warranty and will die in a year or two and can't modern games at even modest settings when I can spend half that and get a Fusion netbook that can game? Even without gaming in mind you could probably get a cheaper AMD netbook, throw in a decent SSD and see it blow away a grand slim-laptop. Nvidia looking at the success or failure of other companies is good. Sure sometimes bad execution can gimp a great product but good execution can't save an undesired product. Personally I don't want a slim product, I want an affordable and capable product.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JAB Creations</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:56:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23990-nvidia-doesn’t-believe-in-ultrabooks#comment-30438</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23990-nvidia-doesn’t-believe-in-ultrabooks#comment-30383</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Blah, blah blah.. does anyone at Nvidia have ANYTHING interesting to say? I guess they could tell the truth: their ship is sinking, and they will be gone within 2 years.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:42:19 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23990-nvidia-doesn’t-believe-in-ultrabooks#comment-30383</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
