<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>2013 Bulldozer successor is 28nm</title>
		<description>Discuss 2013 Bulldozer successor is 28nm</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:25:31 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23907/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>crackerz says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30296</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I really don't care what will happen on 2013 or 2020.. technology is a "liquid" thing, changes ALL the time, by 2013 we might have quantum cpu's, flying cars..people cure cancer, aids etc... but again people might destroy the earth and we might not exist anymore, so I think every people that talks about 3-5 or more years for something spectacular in advance is pointless]]></description>
			<dc:creator>crackerz</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 07:50:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30296</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>cllund79 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30178</link>
			<description><![CDATA[bro_fist has fisted, is fisting, and will fist his bro.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>cllund79</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 03:09:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30178</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bro_fist says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30050</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Intel 22nm, AMD 28nm. :D AMD failed, failing, will fail.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bro_fist</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:59:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30050</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdfighter says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30043</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fudo bashing AMD again. I'm pretty sure nothing is finalized yet, and that GloFo won't be 3 years late for 22nm. Stop taking every AMD-negative news-source and act like it's 100% true.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdfighter</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:01:53 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30043</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>noypogs16 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30034</link>
			<description><![CDATA[hey! intelvidia fanboy, wrong article again, wrong sources, dont guess! ask directly amd,you idiot!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>noypogs16</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 04:53:46 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30034</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>saneblane says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30019</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Every Amd cpu article that fud writes is full of shit. I have read a few of them and they are the same "the sky is falling run for the hills, cause Amd is collapsing" kind of nonsense. http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2011/8/30/globalfoundries-announces-20nm-process-no-to-soi.aspx 28nm gpu's are coming out this year and if Amd is going to use 28nm for next year for the bulldozer refresh, then that is the best thing they could do. Cause if they didn't they would be waiting for 22nm. And glofo do have 22nm in the works. So this could work out fine for Amd, as they would be able to use every new process shrink from Glofo.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>saneblane</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:39:22 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30019</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dan says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30015</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Of course it's not true. Fudo doesn't have a clue what he's talking about. GloFo are sticking to SOI and AMD will be using it for future processors. http://www.globalfoundries.com/technology/value-added.aspx]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:21:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30015</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>TechHog says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30006</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I really hope this isn't true. It would be a huge mistake.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>TechHog</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:34:18 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-30006</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-29999</link>
			<description><![CDATA[wow. by the time amd gets to 22nm, intel will be at 14nm!! interesting move.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:12:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-29999</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>redisnidma says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-29998</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The following quote comes from Theo Valich (Brightsideofne ws): ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>redisnidma</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:10:24 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23907-2013-bulldozer-successor-is-28nm#comment-29998</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
