<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Stanford comes up with better organic displays</title>
		<description>Discuss Stanford comes up with better organic displays</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23789-stanford-comes-up-with-better-organic-displays</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:54:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23789/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Marburg_U says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23789-stanford-comes-up-with-better-organic-displays#comment-29353</link>
			<description><![CDATA[>Organic materials >Imaging technology I pretend at least a 7 years warranty.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Marburg_U</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:11:14 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23789-stanford-comes-up-with-better-organic-displays#comment-29353</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
