<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Firefox 7 and 8 this year</title>
		<description>Discuss Firefox 7 and 8 this year</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23772-firefox-7-and-8-this-year</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:15:21 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23772/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Bl0bb3r says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23772-firefox-7-and-8-this-year#comment-29466</link>
			<description><![CDATA[FX 5 could have been called FX 4.1, and FX 6 could have been called FX 4.2 and so on. It's only a minor upgrade so why fear it? It's done automatically anyway, you just have to confirm.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bl0bb3r</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:03:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23772-firefox-7-and-8-this-year#comment-29466</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Harry Lloyd says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23772-firefox-7-and-8-this-year#comment-29360</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fruitcake.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Harry Lloyd</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:39:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23772-firefox-7-and-8-this-year#comment-29360</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mothcoat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23772-firefox-7-and-8-this-year#comment-29317</link>
			<description><![CDATA[What changed from Firefox 5 to 6 anyway? The looks are still the same... The FF6 could have been called 5.1 and fixed the stability issues just the same... This "high number version" race is getting ridiculous IMO.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mothcoat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:01:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23772-firefox-7-and-8-this-year#comment-29317</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Haberlandt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23772-firefox-7-and-8-this-year#comment-29307</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm not liking this :(]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Haberlandt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:53:43 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23772-firefox-7-and-8-this-year#comment-29307</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BernardP says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23772-firefox-7-and-8-this-year#comment-29293</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The way things are going, we'll be at Firefox 12 before the end of 2012. They are simply playing the higher-is-better game.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>BernardP</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:55:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23772-firefox-7-and-8-this-year#comment-29293</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wolfesteinabhi says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23772-firefox-7-and-8-this-year#comment-29232</link>
			<description><![CDATA[seems like Mozilla is trying to match the pace(or lets say version number??) of chrome with its (super?)fast track firefox development! in any case i love both the browsers :) and use then all the time!!!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Wolfesteinabhi</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:28:07 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23772-firefox-7-and-8-this-year#comment-29232</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
