<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Intel to cut some CPU prices</title>
		<description>Discuss Intel to cut some CPU prices</description>
		<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:05:17 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23765/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>gadoran says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29450</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Negligible price cut.....maybe Intel want do little space for upcoming 3.5G 2700 and 3.6G 2800K. In Q1 is likely a 3.7G 2900K. The real news is the absence of Amd !!. Bulldozer seems missing in action for a comsumer user, maybe for a poor mono- thread performance (-15% per integer core vs. K10.5). The 300$ price point will have short life thanks to Intel pressure in clock speed. I don't know how can this company survive selling only sub 140$ devices :(, and future Bulldozer based Liano seems just now a failure in 32nm . Moreover Amd is canibalizing itself cutting the entire Ati budget GPU line cause Liano :). Amd makes in house competition :). My God....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>gadoran</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:36:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29450</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>evolucion8 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29288</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Comparing an AMD K10 design back from 2007 with Sandy Bridge from 2010? You must be a genious!!! What's your name? Albert Gaynstein?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>evolucion8</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:23:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29288</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dan+mr.sucker=amdfagbots says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29260</link>
			<description><![CDATA[some rich $hite from typical idiots like mr.sucker :D whes your boyfriend idiot dan,mr.sucker? ;) synthetics,real word app's,games - all Intel wins,and most funny thing that Intel wins with pure quality - Intel 4 cores >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amd cripled 8 cores..poor mr.sucker,to much sucking i guess? Eye opening FACTS: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/288?vs=362 MHUAHAHAHAA amd even have more ghz,and still sucking at EVERYTHING. More amd cpu's with TLB bugs anyone? LOL amd - fail company with inbred fagboys Always second in EVERYTHING and will be next 127 years.And thats the best scenario for them get back to what you doing best mr.sucker ;)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dan+mr.sucker=amdfagbots</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:56:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29260</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29244</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Actual synthetic and some non synthetic benchmarks are pure shit, they don't tell anything about user experience, and that superpi in particular is a bastardation, wprime is better and multicore.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:47:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29244</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Medallish says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29230</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yeah Superpi, I love that game!, Oh what's that? It's a poor indicator of System perofrmance, aww what's that? It's not even that great an indicator of Singlecore performance? Damn what a shame, I guess we have to use real world applications as Benchmarks instead.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Medallish</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:53:56 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29230</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mothcoat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29221</link>
			<description><![CDATA[And after this generous discount they'll start feeding children in Africa...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mothcoat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:53:16 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29221</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29219</link>
			<description><![CDATA[HIDY HO NEIGHBORINO, lol, i just got done watching jurassic park!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:42:13 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29219</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29211</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Just for remembering people that mighty monopolist intel also fails, sorry. And because i find it funny that everybody is blinded by intel's money, but even if they [censored]ed up several times, always is misteriously forgotten.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:11:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29211</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jurassic1024 says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29208</link>
			<description><![CDATA[thank god the 2500K isnt on that list. picked that bad boy up just yesterday and paired it with a P8P67 EVO. 9sec SuperPi 1M @ 4.4GHz. added a second 2000rpm 120mm sickleflow to my zalman flex cooler. my system is bad-diddly-ass, and "finished" for now. :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jurassic1024</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:11:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29208</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bardenck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29205</link>
			<description><![CDATA[actually if you READ the damn article... 6 OUT OF 9 price cuts were EXACTLY 11 DOLLARS! one of them is a 4 dollar cut!!! and the other one was 12 dollars...can you do math?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>bardenck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:50:09 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23765-intel-to-cut-some-cpu-prices#comment-29205</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
